Open mikemaccana opened 1 year ago
I don’t think changing the default indentation counts as a breaking change.
That said, the default indent is, IIRC, 4 spaces, which I would consider sensible. If it was, say, 8 spaces, I’d be inclined to agree with you, but arguing for 2 spaces instead of 4 on the basis of sensible defaults just feels like pointless bikeshedding.
See also #50855 #2306 (moderately relavent, in that the PR does most of this I believe).
Right now the JS output by the TS compiler is not idiomatic [or] recognisable.
I’m pretty sure emitting 4 spaces instead of 2 doesn’t make the code unrecognizable or even non-idiomatic. 🙄 Please don’t be overdramatic.
@fatcerberus as discussed in the feature request, the vast majority of JavaScript uses two space indentation - using four space indentation does not look like standard JavaScript. Calling other people ‘dramatic’ for pointing that out and posting eye roll emoji is rude and doesn’t help discussion.
Speaking of idiomatic, from idiomatic js:
For readability, I always recommend setting your editor's indent size to two characters — this means two spaces or two spaces representing a real tab.
JavaScript has two spaces. In a fictional world where the compiler was outputting Rust code, and the compiler was outputting two spaces, Rust users would be asking to have the compiler output four spaces - because that's what idiomatic Rust looks like.
I’ve seen lots of indent wars but I’ve never heard anyone claim code was “unrecognizable” as a particular language just because it used a different number of spaces. That’s the part I was calling dramatic, and I stand by it.
I always recommend setting…
This is someone’s opinion and is openly presented as such. I personally find 4 spaces more readable. Neither opinion is more valid than the other. So we’re ultimately just arguing whether we should paint the bikeshed blue or green.
I would also like to point this out: https://github.com/rwaldron/idiomatic.js#i-do-not-intend-to-impose-my-style-preferences-on-other-peoples-code-or-projects-if-an-existing-common-style-exists-it-should-be-respected
idiomatic-js
is a style guide. It happens to be a well-known one and have “idiomatic” in its name. It is explicitly not a mandate nor a standard like the ECMAScript specification that needs to be followed religiously, and using a different style doesn’t make the resulting code suddenly “not JavaScript”.
Anyway, I’ve said my piece. I fully expect this issue to generate much more heat than light but I’ve been surprised before, so let’s see what happens.
@fatcerberus this isn't an 'indent war' or bikeshedding.
Rather than being about anyone's personal preference, this feature request is about collecting data for what recognizable, idiomatic JavaScript looks like, so the TS compiler can output idiomatic, recognizable JavaScript code.
idiomatic-js is a style guide. It happens to be a well-known one and have “idiomatic” in its name.
Yes I am aware of this. The point I was making was that since the word 'idiomatic' also happens to be the name of a JavaScript style guide, it uses...surprise, 2 spaces. 😁
The intro to this feature request now has been updated to include the recommendations from 8 well known different style guides.
Results so far are 7/8 well known guides use two spaces, the jQuery guidelines uses tabs.
using a different style doesn’t make the resulting code suddenly “not JavaScript”.
Nobody in the thread has claimed this. However the uncommon indentation does make the resulting code unusual-looking JavaScript and that's what the request hopes to resolve. 😊
I've added stats for the top 10 npm projects by downloads to the top of this post, and expanded the stats for well known APIs.
If your aim is to improve readability of the generated code, then it should be tabs instead of spaces, allowing users to configure their preferred display width (especially visually impaired people).
And the logical conclusion to the 2 vs 4 spaces dispute is to simply use 3 spaces.
Have added codepen, jsfiddle and jsbin results to top of the PR.
Let say we have an .editorconfig
with :
indent_style = space
indent_size = 2
end_of_line = lf
Our source code is formatted with the settings above obviously.
tsc allows us to set the EOL char in the emitted code via newLine
, nice.
But it doesn't allow us to set the indent style in the emitted code, 😢.
Why would tsc arbitrarily impose 4 spaces indentation in the emitted files, regardless of the source code / .editorconfig or whatever, while there is no tsconfig option to control/override this ?
The best would be imho to either :
Why not ?
Suggestion
Rather than make indention configurable per #4042 and #2768, this feature request is to change the default output of the TypeScript compiler to be 2 spaces, in the next major release.
Summarizing the above, the other well known 4-space style guides, APIs and projects asides from TypeScript are:
This is the end of the list.
🔍 Search Terms
I searched for TS output indentation and came up with #4042 and #2768, which do not propose the same thing as this feature request, which is a sensible value in TS's output JS where 'sensible' is defined as looking like JavaScript.
✅ Viability Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
⭐ Suggestion
Change the number from 4 to 2 so it matches JavaScript. Not asking for a configuration option. TS should have sensible defaults. Sensible defaults for JavaScript include looking like the vast majority of other JavaScript.
📃 Motivating Example
See the links above.
💻 Use Cases
I and many others (according to #4042 and #2768) often look at outputted JS. For example, right now I want to throw
debugger
into somedist
JS in mynode_modules
folder to see why a third party library is behaving oddly. I have to read some very odd-looking JavaScript since the TS compiler doesn't use a sensible default for the indentation value.