References to RFC2616 should probably be switched to RFC 7231 or RFC 7230

microsoft / api-guidelines

Microsoft REST API Guidelines

Other

22.8k stars 2.71k forks source link

References to RFC2616 should probably be switched to RFC 7231 or RFC 7230 #6

Closed darrelmiller closed 8 years ago

darrelmiller commented 8 years ago

RFC 2616 was been replaced by RFC 7230,7231,7232,7233,7334 and 7235 two years ago and is a more consistent, accurate and clearer description of HTTP. Most of the core semantics of HTTP are described in 7231 and would be a better reference than pointing to RFC 2616

RobDolinMS commented 8 years ago

Thanks for the suggestion @darrelmiller. Would you want to submit as a pull request?

darrelmiller commented 8 years ago

Sure, I can do that.

gregpardo commented 8 years ago

Issue #12 is a duplicate of this I believe

cleemullins commented 8 years ago

The PR for this has been merged. Thanks @darrelmiller !