Closed digitaldias closed 3 years ago
Hello! I've been developing a pure .Net desktop application, and was intrigued by appCenter and its ability to distribute development versions to specific testers.
So I hooked up my application to the appCenter, chose windows, and tied it all up to my Azure Devops source.
Now, I'm getting the application to build, even though it is NOT an UWP app. The shortcomings are, as I see them:
I guess I'm one of those guys who still believe in desktop applications, and would love to be able to use appcenter, MAINLY for the ability to distribute test-versions to specific groups of people, but also for the ability to run the Analytics part.
I would also add that I'd love the ability to create a ZIP package for distribution that contains the result equivalent of publishing from VS2017 - using the option "Athe application is available offline as well) that creates a self installer. This is something Azure Devops doesen't offer either.
Referencing #53 #85
@digitaldias have you looked at the packaging project to produce APPX/MSIX packages? these tachnologies can replace ClickOnce and are easily configured from AzureDevOps.
This issue is preventing us from migrating completely to App Center. We currently distribute our .NET application as an MSI through HockeyApp. I do not think we can use APPX/MSIX at this time because we still support Windows 7, and from my understanding APPX/MSIX is not supported on Windows 7. Please consider including this issue on your roadmap.
@leoniDEV I stand corrected. Thank you! I will investigate MSIX and see if it will meet our needs.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 15 days of this comment.
This issue will now be closed because it hasn't had any activity for 15 days after stale. Please feel free to open a new issue if you still have a question/issue or suggestion.
Describe the solution you'd like A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.