Enhance NFRs Page by adding missing requirements and including examples

[dgregoraz]

Pull Request Template

What are you trying to address

Enhancing the Non-Functional Requirements Capture page to categorize and incorporate missing NFR references when available, including several NFRs that were not specified in the playbook.

• The updated NFR Capture page now features a comprehensive list of NFRs with brief descriptions, links to detailed pages for further information, and a concise summary of common metrics.
• New pages have been created for each previously missing NFR, adhering to the appropriate template.

Checklist

READY TO PR? Use the check-list below to ensure your branch is ready for PR.

• [x] Changes follow the repo structure and land in the appropriate folder and section
• [x] No confidential information
• [x] No duplicated content
• [x] Labeled appropriately
• [x] This PR was reviewed by at least one subject matter expert
• [x] No lint check errors related to your changes

Note: You may see link check errors on pages you have not touched. This is normal, and due to either broken links or sites that reject link checker bots. The reviewer will help you get to a green state on these.

[github-actions[bot]]

🦙 MegaLinter status: ⚠️ WARNING

Descriptor	Linter	Files	Fixed	Errors	Elapsed time
✅ MARKDOWN	markdownlint	14		0	0.87s
⚠️ MARKDOWN	markdown-table-formatter	14		1	0.32s
✅ MDLINKCHECK	linkcheck	14		0	1.33s
⚠️ SPELL	cspell	15		1	2.67s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports _Set VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASE: true in mega-linter.yml to validate all sources, not only the diff_

_MegaLinter is graciously provided by _

[dgregoraz]

Thank you much for this content.

I added comments mainly on the markdown and folder structure, plus some typos. Feel free to reset the review once you have made the appropriate changes, and I can re-review or Shiran or Nick can review depending on who is available.

Done!