Adds supplier/license info to pip components.

[sebasgomez238]

This only covers the default PythonResolver. This information cannot be added to the SimplePythonResolver without making additional calls which would defeat the purpose of using the SimplePythonResolver.

Classifier field specification: https://peps.python.org/pep-0301/#distutils-trove-classification and https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/core-metadata/#classifier-multiple-use

Why we prioritize License field over Classifier License field: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/core-metadata/#license

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (cf78e59) 75.1% compared to head (edcdf17) 75.2%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ft.ComponentDetection.Detectors/pip/IPyPiClient.cs	75.0%	2 Missing :warning:
...ComponentDetection.Detectors/pip/PythonResolver.cs	97.2%	0 Missing and 1 partial :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #938 +/- ## ======================================= + Coverage 75.1% 75.2% +0.1% ======================================= Files 233 234 +1 Lines 10006 10052 +46 Branches 984 990 +6 ======================================= + Hits 7515 7560 +45 Misses 2220 2220 - Partials 271 272 +1 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions[bot]]

👋 Hi! It looks like you modified some files in the Detectors folder. You may need to bump the detector versions if any of the following scenarios apply:

• The detector detects more or fewer components than before
• The detector generates different parent/child graph relationships than before
• The detector generates different devDependencies values than before

If none of the above scenarios apply, feel free to ignore this comment 🙂