Closed da5is closed 1 month ago
Added this to the list for the September release for investigation.
@BenShy, if you have any context, that might help us determine the right fix.
@allcontributors Please add da5is for bug
@flanakin
I've put up a pull request to add @da5is! :tada:
@flanakin This is for the workbook. Seif and I have been in touch with @da5is already.
This is fixed and will be shipped with the next release (0.6)
đ Problem
In cases where a Windows Virtual Machine is deployed and licenseType is set null or Windows SQL servers indicate SQL but not Windows (such as potential ws2012 deployments), the AHB report does not show these VMs as eligible but not covered by AHB.
_Verbatim customer comment: " I can see we are being charged for Windows Server Licenses, but they donât have the License_Type = WindowsServer. I believe this is happening for two reasons, either we didnât enter any âSource image detailsâ or the details indicate âSQLâ but the OS is âWindowsâ."
đŁ Repro steps
Deploy VMs uncovered by AHB that meet these criteria - they will not show up as potential AHB candidates in the workbook.
âšď¸ Additional context
I believe this is related to lines 125 and 159 where we're checking for Windows in licenseType explicitly, which doesn't detect instances where licenseType is null or Windows isn't the explicit string (such as ws2012).