Garnet is a remote cache-store from Microsoft Research that offers strong performance (throughput and latency), scalability, storage, recovery, cluster sharding, key migration, and replication features. Garnet can work with existing Redis clients.
I am trying to limit the maximum memory garnet can use, however when I set it using the documented "MemorySize" I don't see it reflected when I query it using CONFIG GET maxmemory
Even though during startup I can see this line in the logs:
[000.2024-05-23 13:57:38.2895] (Information) <Options> [Store] Using log memory size of 2g
When I set it manually during runtime with CONFIG SET maxmemory 2g I immediately see it reflected as the memory usage of my instances will go down and keys will be reported evicted.
Steps to reproduce the bug
Deploy garnet like so: /garnet --config-import-path /etc/garnet/garnet.conf
garnet.conf:
{
"MemorySize": "2g",
}
Expected behavior
The changes should be reflected in CONFIG GET maxmemory, and if the memory consumption is larger it should evict keys based on the policy instantly.
It turns out my test machines were improperly setup and this might not actually be an issue. I will close it and reopen if I can confirm for sure. Sorry for the noise.
Describe the bug
I am trying to limit the maximum memory garnet can use, however when I set it using the documented "MemorySize" I don't see it reflected when I query it using
CONFIG GET maxmemory
Even though during startup I can see this line in the logs:
When I set it manually during runtime with
CONFIG SET maxmemory 2g
I immediately see it reflected as the memory usage of my instances will go down and keys will be reported evicted.Steps to reproduce the bug
Deploy garnet like so:
/garnet --config-import-path /etc/garnet/garnet.conf
garnet.conf:
Expected behavior
The changes should be reflected in
CONFIG GET maxmemory
, and if the memory consumption is larger it should evict keys based on the policy instantly.Screenshots
No response
Release version
v1.0.10 (linux x64)
IDE
No response
OS version
Debian
Additional context
No response