Closed shijunpeng15 closed 3 months ago
garnet.json or garnet.conf ? ... they both work
garnet.json or garnet.conf ? ... they both work
you can name it however you want.
"6370:6379"
why does this have two different ports?
[./GarnetServer - i 128m -- port 6379]
why is there a space between --
and port
. The whole line is badly formatted.
garnet.json or garnet.conf ? ... they both work
you can name it however you want.
"6370:6379"
why does this have two different ports?
[./GarnetServer - i 128m -- port 6379]
why is there a space between
--
andport
. The whole line is badly formatted.
sorry, copy wrong .please see the picture. garnet.json set 6370,but not work
Setting the port number under the command parameter is effective, but it doesn't work in the configuration file
conf doesn't work because the command line above overrides it to 6379 - see above your screenshot
conf doesn't work because the command line above overrides it to 6379 - see above your screenshot
hope the command line does not display port. This can easily be misleading. Use default port without configuration file, use configuration port with configuration file
Describe the bug
When I pulled the image and ran it, I checked the running commands as follows: [./GarnetServer - i 128m -- port 6379] [-- config import path/app/garnet. json]. The port number used for execution was not declared in the garnet.json file, and it is also not 3278.
My docker-compose.yml:
My garnet.json:
Steps to reproduce the bug
...
Expected behavior
No response
Screenshots
No response
Release version
No response
IDE
No response
OS version
No response
Additional context
No response