Open 5c4lar opened 2 years ago
I've seen issue https://github.com/microsoft/llvm-mctoll/issues/33 , so how should I handle _Znwm now?
Thanks for your interest in llvm-mctoll
.
I've seen issue #33 , so how should I handle _Znwm now?
Issue #33 resulted in implementation of libtool-based function prototype parsing in llvm-mctoll
. However, support to raise C++ binaries is not yet implemented as stated in my reply.
Discovering function prototype signatures by demangling C++ function symbols would be part of the support to raise C++ binaries. Any help with adding support to raise C++ binaries (starting with simple ones) - before I get to it - is highly appreciated.
External function signature can be easily obtained by demangling the symbols, for example
would you consider supporting this?