Create mocks for PlatformHookLib and PciLib

TsunFeng commented 2 months ago

Description

[ ] Impacts functionality?
- Functionality - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions?
- Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ...
[ ] Impacts security?
- Security - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application, flow, or firmware?
- Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter validation improvement, ...
[ ] Breaking change?
- Breaking change - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break in build or boot behavior?
- Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
[x] Includes tests?
- Tests - Does the change include any explicit test code?
- Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
[ ] Includes documentation?
- Documentation - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
- Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation on an a separate Web page, ...

How This Was Tested

Unit tests component can call PlatformHookLib and PciLib mock functions success

Integration Instructions

N/A

codecov-commenter commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 1.35%. Comparing base (d75e9f7) to head (f21a0e2).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## release/202311 #1094 +/- ## ================================================== + Coverage 1.27% 1.35% +0.08% ================================================== Files 1302 1303 +1 Lines 332836 333838 +1002 Branches 3738 5103 +1365 ================================================== + Hits 4229 4512 +283 - Misses 328474 329243 +769 + Partials 133 83 -50 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_basecore/pull/1094/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [MdeModulePkg](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_basecore/pull/1094/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | `0.68% <ø> (+0.06%)` | :arrow_up: | | [MdePkg](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_basecore/pull/1094/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | `5.40% <ø> (ø)` | | | [NetworkPkg](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_basecore/pull/1094/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | `0.55% <ø> (+0.19%)` | :arrow_up: | | [PolicyServicePkg](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_basecore/pull/1094/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | `30.41% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TsunFeng commented 2 months ago

Hi @VivianNK, @apop5 and @os-d Could you help merge the PR to the base branch?

Thanks, TF

microsoft / mu_basecore