Update release version to v11 to match release versioning

[kuqin12]

Description

We have not updated this field for too long, which will make the print out during runtime have discrepancy compared to the code release version. This change is made to fix that.

• [ ] Impacts functionality?
  • Functionality - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions?
  • Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ...
• [ ] Impacts security?
  • Security - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application, flow, or firmware?
  • Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter validation improvement, ...
• [ ] Breaking change?
  • Breaking change - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break in build or boot behavior?
  • Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
• [ ] Includes tests?
  • Tests - Does the change include any explicit test code?
  • Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
• [ ] Includes documentation?
  • Documentation - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
  • Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation on an a separate Web page, ...

How This Was Tested

This is only a version change, no functional update.

Integration Instructions

N/A

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 0.31%. Comparing base (200ba10) to head (ba4ca61).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #280 +/- ## ======================================== - Coverage 0.47% 0.31% -0.17% ======================================== Files 144 144 Lines 21934 21916 -18 Branches 60 60 ======================================== - Hits 105 69 -36 + Misses 21824 21820 -4 - Partials 5 27 +22 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_feature_mm_supv/pull/280/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [MmSupervisorPkg](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_feature_mm_supv/pull/280/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | `0.31% <ø> (-0.17%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.