Added MmSupervisorCoreGuid

kenlautner commented 5 months ago

Description

Added gMmSupervisorCoreGuid to the supervisor dec file. The value of this GUID is exactly the same as the MmSupervisorCore.inf file GUID and it's used to reference supervisor module directly instead of relying on gEfiCallerGuid.

For each item, place an "x" in between [ and ] if true. Example: [x]. (you can also check items in the GitHub UI)

[ ] Impacts functionality?
- Functionality - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions?
- Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ...
[ ] Impacts security?
- Security - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application, flow, or firmware?
- Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter validation improvement, ...
[ ] Breaking change?
- Breaking change - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break in build or boot behavior?
- Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
[ ] Includes tests?
- Tests - Does the change include any explicit test code?
- Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
[ ] Includes documentation?
- Documentation - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
- Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation on an a separate Web page, ...

How This Was Tested

Tested with CI and a physical platform. No issues observed.

Integration Instructions

N/A

kuqin12 commented 5 months ago

Looks like you need to grant GUID duplication exception in the package dec.

kuqin12 commented 5 months ago

Test

codecov-commenter commented 5 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (feature/spam@6c08295). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## feature/spam #289 +/- ## ============================================== Coverage ? 0.46% ============================================== Files ? 144 Lines ? 22349 Branches ? 60 ============================================== Hits ? 105 Misses ? 22239 Partials ? 5 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_feature_mm_supv/pull/289/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [MmSupervisorPkg](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_feature_mm_supv/pull/289/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | `0.46% <ø> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

microsoft / mu_feature_mm_supv