Implementing new ABIs

[kuqin12]

Preface

Please ensure you have read the contribution docs prior to submitting the pull request. In particular, pull request guidelines.

Description

This change added 2 new ABIs for supporting the VMCALLs.

For each item, place an "x" in between [ and ] if true. Example: [x]. (you can also check items in the GitHub UI)

• [x] Impacts functionality?
  • Functionality - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions?
  • Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ...
• [ ] Impacts security?
  • Security - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application, flow, or firmware?
  • Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter validation improvement, ...
• [ ] Breaking change?
  • Breaking change - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break in build or boot behavior?
  • Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ...
• [ ] Includes tests?
  • Tests - Does the change include any explicit test code?
  • Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ...
• [ ] Includes documentation?
  • Documentation - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions outside direct code modifications (and comments)?
  • Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation on an a separate Web page, ...

How This Was Tested

This change is not tested.

Integration Instructions

N/A

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Please upload report for BASE (feature/spam@a63f5de). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## feature/spam #313 +/- ## ============================================== Coverage ? 0.30% ============================================== Files ? 144 Lines ? 22332 Branches ? 60 ============================================== Hits ? 69 Misses ? 22236 Partials ? 27 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_feature_mm_supv/pull/313/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [MmSupervisorPkg](https://app.codecov.io/gh/microsoft/mu_feature_mm_supv/pull/313/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft) | `0.30% <ø> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=microsoft#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.