Add optional condition when updating/re-opening Work Items

[tevoinea]

Summary of the Pull Request

What is this about?

Work Items marked as "Won't Fix" or similar shouldn't be re-opened. Our AdoTemplate didn't have an affordance for that capability.

This PR adds an "Unless" field to on_duplicate. When all of the fields and values in "Unless" match the work item, we will skip updating it.

PR Checklist

• [ ] Applies to work item: #xxx
• [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over here and sign the CLI.
• [ ] Tests added/passed
• [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
• [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx

Info on Pull Request

What does this include?

Validation Steps Performed

How does someone test & validate?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3227 (e46ce90) into main (512bb07) will increase coverage by 0.10%. The diff coverage is 79.31%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3227      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   29.55%   29.65%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         332      332              
  Lines       39199    39211      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        11584    11629      +45     
+ Misses      27615    27582      -33     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/ApiService/ApiService/OneFuzzTypes/Model.cs	72.72% <71.42%> (+0.03%)	:arrow_up:
...Service/ApiService/onefuzzlib/notifications/Ado.cs	11.53% <86.66%> (+11.53%)	:arrow_up:

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes