Add a way for users to say e.g. "linear or logarithmic complexity" in a complexity annotation. One way to do this may be to overload the | operator: TimeComplexity(cplx.linear | cplx.logarithmic).
This would mean that the complexity classes would need to be instance of some other class instead of classes themselves. It may also be nice to define some commonly-used groups, e.g. sub-linear.
Add a way for users to say e.g. "linear or logarithmic complexity" in a complexity annotation. One way to do this may be to overload the
|operator:TimeComplexity(cplx.linear | cplx.logarithmic).This would mean that the complexity classes would need to be instance of some other class instead of classes themselves. It may also be nice to define some commonly-used groups, e.g. sub-linear.