Open gitmadness opened 1 year ago
Hello @gitmadness,
Could you please clarify (1) - would 0
mean there would be no bucketization at all?
Would it work for you to provide a custom bug bucketing function? This would work similarly to checkers, where you would specify a python file in the engine settings, which implements an interface that takes the required information for generating a bug bucket and returns the bug hash.
Thanks,
Marina
Could you please clarify (1) - would
0
mean there would be no bucketization at all?
Maybe now that you mentioned it. I was just thinking the bucket is based on the last request - response rather than sequence of request-responses.
For example, assume there are 4 request-responses like below:
Request 1 - HTTP 200 Request 2 - HTTP 200 Request 3 - HTTP 200 Request 4 - HTTP 500
If 1 is specified, the bucketing algorithm will only evaluate whether Request 3 is part of the sequence leading to the HTTP 500 hit by Request 4.
If 0 is specified, the bucketing algorithm will not evaluate Requests 1 to 3.
Would it work for you to provide a custom bug bucketing function? This would work similarly to checkers, where you would specify a python file in the engine settings, which implements an interface that takes the required information for generating a bug bucket and returns the bug hash.
Good idea. This might be a more flexible approach.
đź’ˇ Idea
We are looking for more control over RESTler’s bug bucketing functionality to enable additional analysis of RESTler result with more configurable bug bucketing.
We would like to configure the following bucketing behavior.
Design Notes
No response