Closed DaveTryon closed 1 month ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 70.13%. Comparing base (
552c36c
) to head (4499fac
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Would CentralPackageTransitivePinningEnabled avoid the need to explicitly promote the transitive dependency to direct? https://learn.microsoft.com/nuget/consume-packages/Central-Package-Management#transitive-pinning
Would CentralPackageTransitivePinningEnabled avoid the need to explicitly promote the transitive dependency to direct? https://learn.microsoft.com/nuget/consume-packages/Central-Package-Management#transitive-pinning
Thanks for the tip, @KalleOlaviNiemitalo! I experimented with this option, and we run into problems with mixed versions of System.Reactive
and System.Threading.Tasks.Dataflow
, coming largely through transitive dependencies. This can probably be addressed, but that would be a separate change, well beyond the scope of addressing a CVE.
CVE-2024-43483 requires that we bump
Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory
from 8.0.0 to 8.0.1. This is a transitive dependency from Component Detection. that they are likely to eventually pick up, at which time we can revert this change.Redacted output from
dotnet nuget why
before the change -- version of Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory is 8.0.0:Redacted output from
dotnet nuget why
before the change -- version of Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory is 8.0.1: