Open MichaelSuen-thePointer opened 1 year ago
Not laggy, 5900 is not a huge number to be honest.
It seems like 5899 profiles is the limit then. 😄
But in all seriousness, yes, I agree, it should be performant. There's no reason why it should be worse than O(n) and n=5900 for anything is not that much. 🙂
Windows Terminal version
1.16.10261.0
Windows build number
10.0.19042.1110
Other Software
No response
Steps to reproduce
I have to manage a server cluster with about 5900 machines. I script-generated
settings.json
with all this 5900 ssh profiles for every machine. And group them by using "actions">"commands" insettings.json
Which causes the 'V' button response laggy and settings panel unable to open (whole program hangs).Its not a rare use case I think. Hope you can optimize this senario.
Sample
settings.json
, to reproduce this issue, you need manually generatesettings.json
with that many profiles, below is the sample.Expected Behavior
Not laggy, 5900 is not a huge number to be honest.
Actual Behavior
Laggy V button, settings UI unable to open.