python:3.10-bullseye has Python 3.9 instead

[BorjaEst]

• VSCode Version: 1.73.1
• Local OS Version: Windows_NT x64 10.0.19045
• Local chip architecture: 64-bit
• Reproduces in: Remote - Containers
• Name of Dev Container Definition with Issue: python:3.10-bullseye

Steps to Reproduce:

1 .devcontainer.json

{
    "name": "Python 3",
    "image": "mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/python:3.10-bullseye",
    "features": {
        "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/node:1": {
            "version": "lts"
        },
        "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/common-utils:1": {},
        "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/git:1": {},
        "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/nvidia-cuda:1": {},
        "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/python:1": {},
        "ghcr.io/rocker-org/devcontainer-features/pandoc:1": {},
        "ghcr.io/devcontainers-contrib/features/pylint:1": {},
        "ghcr.io/devcontainers-contrib/features/tox:1": {}
    },

    // Use 'forwardPorts' to make a list of ports inside the container available locally.
    // "forwardPorts": [],

    // Use 'postCreateCommand' to run commands after the container is created.
    "postCreateCommand": "pip3 install --user -r requirements-test.txt",

    // Configure tool-specific properties.
    // "customizations": {},

    // Set `remoteUser` to `root` to connect as root instead. More info: https://aka.ms/vscode-remote/containers/non-root.
    "remoteUser": "vscode"
}

2 Terminal

vscode ➜ /workspaces/genca (dev ✗) $ python
Python 3.9.2 (default, Feb 28 2021, 17:03:44) 
[GCC 10.2.1 20210110] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

See that Python 3.9 is installed instead of 3.10.

[Chuxel]

@BorjaEst You included the "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/python:1": {} feature which will default to installing the OS version of python and including that in the path. If you only want the tools in the python feature, set version to none. "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/python:1": { "version": "none" }

Also note that all of these tools are already in the image, so you can probably just remove that line.

[BorjaEst]

@Chuxel, that solved the issue, thanks!