Closed realDuang closed 3 weeks ago
I'm guessing this might be a key value conflict due to the fact that the kernel picker is traversing the name in the kernelspec. Should it use the object key of the kernelspec
as the key for the list, so that all the lists in kernelspec request can be displayed?
Name must be the same as the object key vbalue. This is what it must return
kernelspecs: {
python310: {
name: 'python310',
spec: {
language: 'Python',
argv: [],
display_name: 'Python 3.10',
codemirror_mode: null,
env: null,
help_links: null,
metadata: {
debugger: true,
runtime_version: JupyterRuntimeKernel.python310
}
},
resources: {}
},
python311: {
name: 'python311',
spec: {
language: 'Python',
argv: [],
display_name: 'Python 3.11',
codemirror_mode: null,
env: null,
help_links: null,
metadata: {
debugger: true,
runtime_version: JupyterRuntimeKernel.python311
}
},
resources: {}
}
}
I'm include not to change anything in Jupyter extension, as this is how jupyter lab/notebook work today, i.e. thats the format of the data returned. I would suggest changing this at your end. Closing as the data returned is invalid, changing as suggested should fix this.
Applies To
What happened?
We have registered a custom server collection to proxy all the jupyter requests.
When jupyter tries to call jupyterApi/versions/1/api/kernelspecs, we set the return like this:
But when i open the switch kernel picker, it only shows one result:
VS Code Version
1.94
Jupyter Extension Version
v2024.9.1
Jupyter logs
No response
Coding Language and Runtime Version
No response
Language Extension Version (if applicable)
No response
Anaconda Version (if applicable)
No response
Running Jupyter locally or remotely?
Remote