microsoft / vscode

Visual Studio Code
https://code.visualstudio.com
MIT License
164.23k stars 29.29k forks source link

Panel grab bar is too small and should be expanded by 2px #200103

Closed thadguidry closed 10 months ago

thadguidry commented 11 months ago

Type: Bug

The Panel grab bar active area is too small currently and requires the most precise mouse movements in order to highlight and grab its top bar to expand it vertically. I would appreciate if the active area was increased about 2px above and below it's current active grab range.

Video of the problem

https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/assets/986438/b206008a-3edf-40a0-a7c2-197af7d3712f

VS Code version: Code - Insiders 1.85.0-insider (6d33f515e8cbe8c134c75f81a6764c9a2bdde620, 2023-12-05T22:06:57.246Z) OS version: Windows_NT x64 10.0.23595 Modes:

System Info |Item|Value| |---|---| |CPUs|Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9700K CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 x 3600)| |GPU Status|2d_canvas: enabled
canvas_oop_rasterization: enabled_on
direct_rendering_display_compositor: disabled_off_ok
gpu_compositing: enabled
multiple_raster_threads: enabled_on
opengl: enabled_on
rasterization: enabled
raw_draw: disabled_off_ok
video_decode: enabled
video_encode: enabled
vulkan: disabled_off
webgl: enabled
webgl2: enabled
webgpu: enabled| |Load (avg)|undefined| |Memory (System)|63.93GB (54.65GB free)| |Process Argv|--crash-reporter-id ec828980-5f99-4b3a-9589-b598d2900347| |Screen Reader|no| |VM|0%|
Extensions (47) Extension|Author (truncated)|Version ---|---|--- asciidoctor-vscode|asc|3.1.10 vscode-eslint|dba|2.4.2 gitlens|eam|2023.12.504 EditorConfig|Edi|0.16.4 prettier-vscode|esb|10.1.0 vscode-firefox-debug|fir|2.9.10 copilot|Git|1.140.0 copilot-chat|Git|0.11.0 vscode-pull-request-github|Git|0.77.2023120509 vscode-graphql|Gra|0.8.20 vscode-graphql-syntax|Gra|1.2.2 todo-tree|Gru|0.0.226 vscode-docker|ms-|1.28.0 vscode-edge-devtools|ms-|2.1.3 vscode-kubernetes-tools|ms-|1.3.15 playwright|ms-|1.0.19 isort|ms-|2023.11.13191009 python|ms-|2023.23.13391009 vscode-pylance|ms-|2023.11.102 remote-containers|ms-|0.326.0 remote-wsl|ms-|0.81.8 cmake-tools|ms-|1.17.5 cpptools|ms-|1.19.1 cpptools-extension-pack|ms-|1.3.0 test-adapter-converter|ms-|0.1.8 vsliveshare|ms-|1.0.5896 htmx-tags|oto|0.0.8 java|red|1.25.0 vscode-xml|red|0.26.2023120208 vscode-yaml|red|1.14.0 rust-analyzer|rus|0.4.1759 sonarlint-vscode|Son|4.1.0 code-spell-checker|str|3.0.1 vscode-stylelint|sty|1.3.0 svelte-vscode|sve|108.1.0 even-better-toml|tam|0.19.2 cmake|twx|0.0.17 vscode-boot-dev-pack|vmw|0.2.1 vscode-spring-boot|vmw|1.51.2023120505 vscode-gradle|vsc|3.13.2023112207 vscode-java-debug|vsc|0.55.0 vscode-java-dependency|vsc|0.23.2023120100 vscode-java-pack|vsc|0.25.2023110908 vscode-java-test|vsc|0.40.2023101002 vscode-maven|vsc|0.43.0 vscode-spring-initializr|vsc|0.11.2023070103 markdown-all-in-one|yzh|3.5.1 (1 theme extensions excluded)
A/B Experiments ``` vsliv695:30137379 vsins829:30139715 vsliv368cf:30146710 vsreu685:30147344 python383:30185418 vspor879:30202332 vspor708:30202333 vspor363:30204092 vslsvsres303:30308271 pythontb:30258533 pythonptprofiler:30281269 vshan820:30294714 vscod805:30301674 bridge0708:30335490 bridge0723:30353136 vsaa593:30376534 pythonvs932:30404738 py29gd2263:30784851 vscaac:30438845 vsclangdf:30492506 c4g48928:30535728 dsvsc012cf:30540253 showlangstatbar:30737417 fixshowwlkth:30771523 showindicator:30805243 pythongtdpath:30726887 i26e3531:30792625 welcomedialog:30812478 pythonnosmt12:30779711 pythonidxpt:30768918 pythonnoceb:30776497 asynctok:30898717 dsvsc013:30777762 dsvsc014:30777825 pythonmpswarning:30901777 dsvsc015:30821418 pythontestfixt:30866404 pythonregdiag2:30902439 pyreplss1:30879911 pythonmypyd1:30859725 pythoncet0:30859736 pythontbext0:30879054 accentitlementst:30870582 dsvsc016:30879898 dsvsc017:30880771 dsvsc018:30880772 aa_t_chat:30882232 ```
gjsjohnmurray commented 11 months ago

Does the workbench.sash.size setting help you?

thadguidry commented 11 months ago

Thanks! My updated Beautiful settings now below. Hmm, which should be default? But maybe it's just my large resolution 2560x1440 that the shipping defaults don't work so well. Maybe smarter calculated defaults could be had by inspecting the resolution and expand the grab area (sash size) a bit on higher density resolutions? I wonder how many folks complained about this in the past? image

sbatten commented 10 months ago

closing as setitngs resolve issue