Not sure why, but there is a difference in the sources/source element and the relative path in the packages/package/classes/class@filename attribute.
The Hypothesis report is using the .csproj folder as a base, whereas the other two use the .sln folder. That may be up to coverlet to fix, but maybe is also a problem for the coverage tool to handle well?
I still see the same results as described here: https://github.com/codecov/uploader/issues/915
reportgenerator '-reports:**/coverage.*.xml' -targetdir:reports -reporttypes:html
./reports/index.htm
dotnet coverage merge coverage.cobertura.xml -r -f cobertura
reportgenerator '-reports:output.cobertura.xml' -targetdir:reports -reporttypes:html
Not sure why, but there is a difference in the
sources/source
element and the relative path in thepackages/package/classes/class@filename
attribute.The Hypothesis report is using the
.csproj
folder as a base, whereas the other two use the.sln
folder. That may be up to coverlet to fix, but maybe is also a problem for the coverage tool to handle well?