Closed kennykerr closed 1 week ago
I think https://github.com/microsoft/wdkmetadata/commit/214d88031318a188fb643d4bbbd1ee20a30af75e is wrong as those fields must still be pointers. They're just not opaque pointers.
I think 214d880 is wrong as those fields must still be pointers. They're just not opaque pointers.
Thanks. Fixed.
The metadata has this:
But the header has this definition:
Admittedly the types are only lurking in the comments, but it would be useful if we can actually use the correct types as they do exist in metadata.