search

microsoft / winget-pkgs

The Microsoft community Windows Package Manager manifest repository
MIT License
8.56k stars 4.45k forks source link

Package parity with PortableApps #897

Closed superusercode closed 3 years ago

superusercode commented 4 years ago

This is primarily a tracking issue for myself with the intent to add packages not yet included from PortableApps, make sure they use static installer links, ensure the right installer types are being used, and include as much information possible in the manifests (such as descriptions, tags, cli names, etc.). I will avoid unsupported or EOL releases.

Accessibility

latere-a-latere commented 4 years ago

OpenTTD has been added: https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs/pull/698 XMoto is currently awaiting smartscreen verification: https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs/pull/762

superusercode commented 4 years ago

@MarNicGit as long as they pass smartscreen verification they should be good but I've really been trying to add their desktop versions since I'm not sure if the portableapp modified versions will be accepted.

latere-a-latere commented 4 years ago

@superusercode ah yeah the versions being added are the standard desktop versions. Do the portable versions even use installers?

latere-a-latere commented 4 years ago

Hi @superusercode, you can cross off the following applications:

The following applications have PR's open that haven't yet been merged:

I'm probably missing a few, but what can I say - You've got a big list. I'll be adding more from your list in the coming days ahead.

superusercode commented 4 years ago

@MarNicGit I should be all caught up

denelon commented 4 years ago

@superusercode I tagged this as Issue-Question so we don't close it with a PR, and don't triage multiple times due to missing labels.

denelon commented 4 years ago

@superusercode I've enabled GitHub DIscussions. I'm not sure what would happen to your original Issue content. I've converted a few other Issues to Discussions, and I've noticed the linked PRs have been removed when the conversion happens. Would you like me to keep this as an Issue or convert it to a Discussion?

superusercode commented 4 years ago

@denelon I'd prefer it become a discussion since this isn't a serious effort at the moment. Additionally, a lot of the packages in here depend on the zip support.

ghost commented 3 years ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been marked as requiring author feedback but has not had any activity for 7 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days of this comment.