Intents do not expand their assignments

[AcpPasc]

Describe the bug When calling the api (in my case from the graph explorer), trying to get all Intents and their assignements, all assignements are empty

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Go to '(https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/graph-explorer)'
2. Connect to any Tenant with Assigned Intents
3. Make a GET Request on 'https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/deviceManagement/intents?$expand=assignments'
4. See error '"assignments": []'

Expected behavior I would expect an array of the assigned Objects (Hashtables) with id and target{}

Screenshots

{
    "@odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#deviceManagement/intents(id,displayName,isAssigned,assignments,assignments())",
    "value": [
        {
            "id": "672884ca-XXX",
            "displayName": "Security Baseline Edge - Sep. 2020",
            "isAssigned": true,
            "assignments@odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#deviceManagement/intents('672884ca-XXX')/assignments",
            "assignments": []
        },
        {
            "id": "bd899b42-XXX",
            "displayName": "Security Baseline for Windows 10 and later - Nov. 2021",
            "isAssigned": true,
            "assignments@odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#deviceManagement/intents('bd899b42-XXX')/assignments",
            "assignments": []
        }
    ]
}

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: Windows 10 (19044.1826)
• Browser [Edge]
• Version [19044.1826]

Additional context

[Onokaev]

Hey @AcpPasc. I have been able to reproduce this. However, we cannot fix this on the Graph Explorer side. Let me open an issue on the Graph Q and A page for a wider Graph audience

[Onokaev]

Here is a link to the question on the Graph Q and A: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/993931/intents-do-not-expand-their-assignments.html

[Onokaev]

Let me know if you need any further assistance

[AcpPasc]

I do not need further assistance. Thanks for the Info @Onokaev. For now, I can work around it with not optimal secondary requests.

[Onokaev]

Sounds good. If you don't mind, could you add your workaround to the question I have asked on the QandA?

[AcpPasc]

Sounds good. If you don't mind, could you add your workaround to the question I have asked on the QandA?

Sure!