Closed LucieContamin closed 2 years ago
In the most recent commit, I thought that is where I put them. I will double check. Yes, we can add weather data.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 5:23 PM Lucie Contamin @.***> wrote:
I understand that the "abiotic ecosystem data set" concerns "data set that is about an abiotic ecosystem or some abiotic ecosystem element."
In this case, should we change:
- climate data set
- air quality
- natural disaster
- Land cover / Land use as subclasses of "abiotic ecosystem data set" ? I am not certain if Land cover and Land match "abiotic" as it describes biome (for example, desert). Should we use a more generic term for "environmental" information?
Also, would it be possible to add "weather" as a subclass of "abiotic ecosystem data set"?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/midas-network/midas-data/issues/31, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJR55QVPT2LEDXSRY5TNB3VWL25PANCNFSM546VW57Q . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Yes, I apologize I made a mistake, they are already under "abiotic ecosystem data set". Sorry for the confusion.
@hoganwr to add weather data.
I might be incorrect but in the last version of the ontology (version 2022-09-28), it seems that "climate data" is a subclass of "topic" and not "abiotic ecosystem data set". Would it be possible to verify, please?
Correct. We can move climate data set to be a subclass of abiotic ecosystem data set.
I understand that the "abiotic ecosystem data set" concerns "data set that is about an abiotic ecosystem or some abiotic ecosystem element."
In this case, should we change:
Also, would it be possible to add "weather" as a subclass of "abiotic ecosystem data set"?