search

midas-network / midas-data

An ontology for MIDAS data types
1 stars 2 forks source link

Definition update #9

Closed LucieContamin closed 2 years ago

LucieContamin commented 2 years ago

As the form has evolved a little bit, should we add the definition for the new open fields in the ontology?

LucieContamin commented 2 years ago

Just to add some information, these 3 are not "topics" but field we use in the metadata entry/data catalog to input disease, pathogen, and host information. I am not sure it fits in this ontology.

harryhoch commented 2 years ago

@hoganwr, where would these fit? It seems that we should be able to say something about these topics?

hoganwr commented 2 years ago

Yes we can add them. Should we also move COVID-19 to be a subclass of disease?

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:50 PM Harry Hochheiser @.***> wrote:

@hoganwr https://github.com/hoganwr, where would these fit? It seems that we should be able to say something about these topics?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/midas-network/midas-data/issues/9#issuecomment-1233239985, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJR55QTXANZWM6KKY2TKTTV36LQBANCNFSM5Y4CZUHQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

LucieContamin commented 2 years ago

Sorry I am not sure I understand the question, in the last version of the ontology (2022-09-28), these 3 terms are already in the ontology with COVID-19 a subclass of infectious disease subclass of disease. I re-open an issue (#33) about them being subclass of topic or not. I was proposing to have something like:

Topic here is just for example of the level I am talking about, and I happy to discuss this proposition if necessary. Thanks!