Closed Nu70ry closed 8 months ago
Thank you for your feedback and suggestions. Please note that the author might only respond on weekends, so we kindly ask for your patience and understanding.
As what @omodia said in #292, ur 2 feature requests would just over-complicate the app by making the app into a library manager and un-necessarily taking up more RAM and CPU.
These are not even reader related improvements like or performance improvements. Majority of users do not prefer them library managers.
Dev, Please make #292 and #291 optional, If you implement them.🙏🙏🙏🙏
Most of the reason is same as https://github.com/mienaiyami/yomikiru/issues/292#issuecomment-1740667017, but this specifically adds too much unnecessary complexity in the app. As this app is not a host/downloader, i dont think there is any need for such options. Main focus of this app was to provide better reading experience and not a library manager as @omodia mentioned.
Type of reader (if reader related)
None
Description of the new feature / enhancement
A good addition to this program would be the ability to manual filling/searching metadata.
something like: genre/tags, original title, artist, publisher.... Maybe also the possibility to give a personal rating.
And thanks for this tool it's really good.
Scenario when this would be used?
In a search query to more narrow down for metadata
Supporting information
No response