Closed mihaerzen closed 3 months ago
I feel that there's some stuff that should occur before this. For one, the absorbing of eslint-config-standard. Which requires some test changes. I have quite a lot of time tomorrow and Thursday...
absorbing of eslint-config-standard
My apologies, I do not exactly understand what you mean by this. Can you elaborate what you mean with this exactly and how is this related to this PR so I can fix it. Thank you 🙏🏼
It's related because it simplifies the testing.
But it's not strictly necessary. I'm sure your PR can be brought through without it.
I'll take another look.
A quick +1 on the intent of the PR. When using nx
and migrating to its latest version (18.2.0), we'd (seemingly) have to abandon eslint-config-love to do so. It looks like merging this PR (and publishing a new release) would help get us unblocked.
npm ERR! Found: @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin@7.4.0
npm ERR! node_modules/@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin
npm ERR! dev @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin@"7.4.0" from the root project
npm ERR!
npm ERR! Could not resolve dependency:
npm ERR! peer @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin@"^6.4.0" from eslint-config-love@43.1.0
npm ERR! node_modules/eslint-config-love
npm ERR! dev eslint-config-love@"^43.1.0" from the root project
Happy to test an -rc or similar package, if that's helpful!
Sorry for breaking your PR, @mihaerzen !
It was broken with #1483 which was a precursor for #1484 which provides the test coverage needed in order to safely absorb eslint-config-standard.
If you're upset and want me to bump typescript-eslint, please let me know.
If you're upset and want me to bump typescript-eslint, please let me know.
Not a problem, happy to rebase. Seeing resolved-config.ts
isn't this making the standard.ts
and equivalents.ts
(maybe also some other tests) redundant? Personally I feel resolved-config.ts
is a much better test as it covers a full end result and it could be considered the "source of truth". It is also a lot easier to understand as a contributor 🤷
I have rebased and with the necessary upgrade of typescript-eslint
plugin, the existing prefer-promise-reject-errors
according to how to use section should be disabled.
Let me know what you think.
Cheers ✌️
Integration tested our repo against this PR's branch, and it all works beautifully. To get an idea of the integration environment, here's a fragment:
"devDependencies": {
"@babel/core": "^7.24.3",
"@babel/preset-react": "^7.24.1",
"@nx/esbuild": "18.2.1",
"@nx/eslint-plugin": "18.2.1",
"@nx/jest": "18.2.1",
"@nx/js": "18.2.1",
"@nx/linter": "18.2.1",
"@nx/node": "18.2.1",
"@nx/react": "18.2.1",
"@nx/webpack": "18.2.1",
"@nx/workspace": "18.2.1",
"@pmmmwh/react-refresh-webpack-plugin": "^0.5.11",
"@sentry/webpack-plugin": "^2.14.2",
"@swc/cli": "~0.3.12",
"@swc/core": "~1.4.11",
"@swc/helpers": "~0.5.8",
"@swc/jest": "~0.2.36",
"@testing-library/react": "^14.2.2",
"@types/jest": "^29.5.12",
"@types/node": "~20.12.2",
"@types/react": "~18.2.73",
"@types/react-dom": "~18.2.23",
"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "~7.5.0",
"@typescript-eslint/parser": "~7.5.0",
"babel-jest": "^29.7.0",
"esbuild": "~0.19.12",
"eslint": "~8.57.0",
"eslint-config-prettier": "~9.1.0",
"eslint-config-love": "mihaerzen/eslint-config-love#mihaerzen/1453-update-typescript-eslint-parser",
"eslint-plugin-import": "^2.29.1",
"eslint-plugin-jest": "^27.9.0",
"eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y": "^6.8.0",
"eslint-plugin-n": "^16.6.2",
"eslint-plugin-prettier": "^5.1.3",
"eslint-plugin-promise": "^6.1.1",
"eslint-plugin-react": "^7.34.1",
"eslint-plugin-react-hooks": "^4.6.0",
"express": "^4.18.2",
"fake-indexeddb": "^5.0.1",
"http": "^0.0.1-security",
"jest": "^29.7.0",
"jest-environment-jsdom": "^29.7.0",
"jest-environment-node": "^29.7.0",
"jsdom": "^24.0.0",
"nx": "18.2.1",
"path": "^0.12.7",
"prettier": "^3.2.5"
}
Thank you for revising.
I found that v7.0.0 had a peerDep related bug. So we're bumping to v7.0.1 in which that seems to have been fixed.
I found that the package-lock.json
had seemingly unrelated changes. So I re-did the lock change.
I also set the bottom versions to v7.0.1 (they were v7.4.0).
Thank you, @mihaerzen .
@mightyiam Thank you for your patience ✌️
:tada: This PR is included in version 44.0.0 :tada:
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
Hi all! 👋🏼
I was annoyed by the outdated
@typescript-eslint/parser
and I really wanted to use this amazing set of eslint rules, so I went ahead and updated it.This is my first PR to this project, so please do let me know if I made some apparent mistakes. Thank you for maintaining this project! 🙇🏼
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
I have updated the
@typescript-eslint/parser
. I had to also update the@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin
.Which issue (if any) does this pull request address?
Fixes #1453 Closes #1431