Closed sacru2red closed 1 month ago
Thank you, @sacru2red . I added a few details to the readme. Does it suffice now?
@mightyiam Since I am not a native English speaker, I used a tool to write the article below.
You added the “Guidelines” part, etc. great!
Personally, I think it would be a good to add a "History" part at the bottom of README.md so that users of eslint-config-standard-with-typescript would be less confused.
please check my understanding is correct.
Because eslint-config-standard had insufficient support for ts, eslint-config-standard-with-typescript was created,
The versioning rules of eslint-config-standard seem to be rigid and inconvenient because they are related to the standard project. (In fact, the last update was a year ago, and it seems that eslint's latest configuration files, etc. are not supported.)
On the other hand, eslint-config-standard-with-typescript has been constantly updated and versioned, and has gradually moved away from the standard linter rules, and the project seems to have been separated as written in the issue I mentioned.
Is my understanding correct?
Q. Who should use eslint-config-love? In fact, even after reading the Guidelines, I don't think there are any significant motivating factors to use.
Thank you for your feedback. I would actually prefer to keep that piece of history out of the readme. Is there any other way to satisfy your concern?
@mightyiam No, Thank you mightyiam. have a good day
I am using "eslint-config-standard-with-typescript" why I think Its standard project npm say "eslint-config-standard-with-typescript" change to "eslint-config-love", so I updated package.json.
and I read https://github.com/standard/standard/issues/1957
but, I don't understand it properly. Where is this project going? README.md seems to be lacking a lot of explanation about this project.
thank you.
@mightyiam