Open jcklie opened 1 month ago
Hi @jcklie - thanks for reaching out! Happy to accept a contribution for this, probably the latter solution (make schema itself a union of Schema and Bool and rename the existing schema to something like JsonSchema) would be preferable in my mind to reduce the number of places that need updating?
JSON schema has a niche case where are allowed to just consist of a boolean 1. Therefore, this is a valid schema:
I encountered some schemas using this in real life that used this feature and fail parsing with this package. I see two solutions to this problem: extending the union wherever there is a schema used, e.g. turn all
Union[Ref, Schema]
intoUnion[Ref, Schema, bool]
or make schema itself a union ofSchema
andBool
and rename the existing schema to something likeJsonSchema
. I hacked it for myself to use the former solution.