Closed mikeblazanin closed 4 months ago
Or should lag_time be reported relative to the non-NA values? i.e. just among the non-NA values? maybe have an option for relative calculation?
Also should check when min(y) != min[y[!is.na(x) & !is.na(y)]
and warn when they are not equal
This means that if the bacteria are growing exponentially from the beginning, but you have some NA values, the lag_time might actually be 0
Probably should pass a warning whenever lag_time is less than the non-NA data values, because it means there's no detectable lag time from the non-NA values