mikebrady / shairport-sync-docker

Docker setup for Shairport Sync
MIT License
48 stars 19 forks source link

Missing user information when running in Unraid #10

Open timbrueggenthies opened 3 years ago

timbrueggenthies commented 3 years ago

I'm trying to run the shairport-sync-docker container in unraid. As I am only using a pipe to forward the audio to, the only two things added are:

-v /tmp/snapcast:/tmp/snapcast -> The location of the pipe
-v /mnt/domains/shairport:/etc -> The location of the shairport config file

However, when starting the container, following errors appear.

dbus[8]: Could not get password database information for UID of current process: User "???" unknown or no memory to allocate password entry

dbus[8]: Unknown username "root" in message bus configuration file
dbus[8]: Could not get password database information for UID of current process: User "???" unknown or no memory to allocate password entry

dbus[8]: Unknown username "root" in message bus configuration file
dbus[8]: Could not get password database information for UID of current process: User "???" unknown or no memory to allocate password entry

dbus[8]: Unknown username "root" in message bus configuration file
dbus-daemon[8]: Could not get password database information for UID of current process: User "???" unknown or no memory to allocate password entry

dbus-daemon[8]: Failed to start message bus: Could not get UID and GID for username "messagebus"

Do you have an idea what is going wrong there? Thanks in advance.

mikebrady commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the post. It's some kind of D-Bus issue. D-Bus is used by Avahi and also, optionally, by Shairport Sync itself.

mikebrady commented 3 years ago

Hi there. just wondering if you made any progress with this. I'm not familiar with Unraid, I'm afraid.

timbrueggenthies commented 3 years ago

TBH i got carried away by the topic, as I don't have that much time lately for this stuff. I will try again in the coming week, Unraid also received a relatively big update a few month back. Maybe this has solved the issue.

timbrueggenthies commented 3 years ago

The error remains, but I also don't have the time to look further into it.

mikebrady commented 3 years ago

No worries -- thanks for the update.