Closed fiatjaf closed 2 months ago
You make a good point.
I added the 'ci_index' to improve scraping here:
3ee285b7b7a261d14e2a19cdec04d6f77860f991 "store: Rename indexes; Improve scraping (use since and until on ci_index)"
At that time, specifying a single tag or a single author was also falling into the 'scraping' code path else-block that had no index to use at all. After talking to @staab it became clear that there were some reasonable queries that Coracle was making that were falling into that code path. So I created this ci_index
to speed that up.
Later (that same day!) I added a tc_index and an ac_index, which are used when there is at least one tag or author specified. Now that these exist, the ci_index
should probably be retired.
Actually, if you have a very open filter like just ["REQ", "_", {"kinds": [30818], "limit": 50}]
that would get served by the ci
index, and serve the 50 events in backwards-time-order. It needs the created_at part of the index to get those particular most recent events.
Isn't the only use of that index to serve queries that don't contain any tags, any authors and any kinds?
(this is just a humble question)