Open zackpudil opened 6 years ago
Ohhh indeed.
Thanks!
—mike
On Mar 9, 2018, at 7:28 PM, zack pudil notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
In src/event.cpp:68:
case CL_EVENT_COMMAND_EXECUTION_STATUS: { cl_int val; CHECK_ERR(::clGetEventInfo(ev->getRaw(),param_name,sizeof(cl_int), &val, NULL)) info.GetReturnValue().Set(JS_INT(val)); // <---- this line right heer should use JS_NUM? }
the return value of the event execution status is casted to an unsigned int. Shouldn't that use the JS_NUM cast since it's possible to return negative values for errors?
Currently if the CL_EVENT_COMMAND_EXECUTION_STATUS is an error (negative number) the returned status is some big number (e.g 4294967291) because two's compliment being ignored due to unsigned int case. Result should display -5.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/mikeseven/node-opencl/issues/60, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAxYLBlLtokGePTyIz0fLoMja-E3ZVUzks5tc0hOgaJpZM4SlHpj.
In src/event.cpp:68:
the return value of the event execution status is casted to an unsigned int. Shouldn't that use the JS_NUM cast since it's possible to return negative values for errors?
Currently if the CL_EVENT_COMMAND_EXECUTION_STATUS is an error (negative number) the returned status is some big number (e.g 4294967291) because two's compliment being ignored due to unsigned int case. 4294967291 should display as -5.