Closed phanirithvij closed 5 years ago
What's the point?
Not that I'm necessarily against it, but this is an "issue" which would apply to the entirety of the Internet.
The only safe rule is: Unless you know about a site, assume it is NSFW until the opposite has been established. There are no safeguards, only relying on 3-rd party software (think Net Nanny, Cyberpatrol etc.), and purpose-specific TLDs (like .xxx
and so on) are only voluntarily, barely used, and I don't think this approach will ever be really adopted.
Also, which label would you assign to a site like Flickr, for example?
NB: I haven't used the site in a while, and I don't know about any changes made to content policies etc. (since the purchase, for example), but I know for sure that old Flickr definitely hosted some (very) NSFW content.
Yeah, I agree. Just assume every link here is NSFW. From all the sites in the supported sites list, and ignoring everything manga related, there are less than 10 I would not label as NSFW.
Also, which label would you assign to a site like Flickr, for example?
Definitely NSFW in my opinion. A simple search gets you images like this (NSFW btw)
And then there is also the issue of mislabeling a site as Safe for Work, only to get a complaint later on because someone visited this site and got "promoted" as a result. I'd rather not deal with that ...
Calm down people it was just a request cause I accidentally opened an nsfw URL where I'm not supposed to because I didn't know the website.
And it was just a request.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 9:20 PM Mike Fährmann notifications@github.com wrote:
Yeah, I agree. Just assume every link here is NSFW. From all the sites in the supported sites list https://github.com/mikf/gallery-dl/blob/master/docs/supportedsites.rst, and ignoring everything manga related, there are less than 10 I would not label as NSFW.
Also, which label would you assign to a site like Flickr, for example?
Definitely NSFW in my opinion. A simple search gets you images like this https://www.flickr.com/photos/152967812@N06/27014247427/ (NSFW btw)
And then there is also the issue of mislabeling a site as Safe for Work, only to get a complaint later on because someone visited this site and got "promoted" as a result. I'd rather not deal with that ...
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mikf/gallery-dl/issues/335?email_source=notifications&email_token=AHCBL6X3T25CMMVWI7IBAKLP7SMFNA5CNFSM4IDW2YHKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZ6D5MQ#issuecomment-511458994, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHCBL6S3LDTKE63FMHMAY5LP7SMFNANCNFSM4IDW2YHA .
Added an "All links are potentially NSFW" notice to the list of supported sites as well as a nsfw
label to all site support request issues whose target is explicitly NSFW. Sites which host explicit content but it doesn't jump right in your face when you click a link to them havn't gotten a label (yet). No nsfw
label on an issue therefore doesn't imply a site is entirely safe for work.
Please add a new label
nsfw-site
ornsfw-request
ornsfw-site-support-request
for new site-support-requests.And please add
nsfw
beside the nsfw-sites in the supported sites list