In versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition in the jwt.verify() function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the none algorithm for signature verification.
Am I affected?
You will be affected if you do not specify algorithms in the jwt.verify() function
How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the jwt.verify() method.
Will the fix impact my users?
There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the none algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in jwt.verify() options.
Versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm.
Am I affected?
You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below
Key type
algorithm
ec
ES256, ES384, ES512
rsa
RS256, RS384, RS512, PS256, PS384, PS512
rsa-pss
PS256, PS384, PS512
And for Elliptic Curve algorithms:
alg
Curve
ES256
prime256v1
ES384
secp384r1
ES512
secp521r1
How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, If you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes option to true in the sign() and/or verify() functions.
Will the fix impact my users?
There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you already use a valid secure combination of key type and algorithm. Otherwise, use the allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes option to true in the sign() and verify() functions to continue usage of invalid key type/algorithm combination in 9.0.0 for legacy compatibility.
Versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to the secretOrPublicKey argument from the readme link) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens.
Am I affected?
You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function.
For versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, if a malicious actor has the ability to modify the key retrieval parameter (referring to the secretOrPublicKey argument from the readme link) of the jwt.verify() function, they can gain remote code execution (RCE).
Am I affected?
You are affected only if you allow untrusted entities to modify the key retrieval parameter of the jwt.verify() on a host that you control.
auth0/node-jsonwebtoken
### [`v9.0.0`](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#900---2022-12-21)
[Compare Source](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/compare/v8.5.1...v9.0.0)
**Breaking changes: See [Migration from v8 to v9](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/wiki/Migration-Notes:-v8-to-v9)**
##### Breaking changes
- Removed support for Node versions 11 and below.
- The verify() function no longer accepts unsigned tokens by default. (\[[`8345030`](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/commit/834503079514b72264fd13023a3b8d648afd6a16)]https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/commit/834503079514b72264fd13023a3b8d648afd6a16)
- RSA key size must be 2048 bits or greater. (\[[`ecdf6cc`](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/commit/ecdf6cc6073ea13a7e71df5fad043550f08d0fa6)]https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/commit/ecdf6cc6073ea13a7e71df5fad043550f08d0fa6)
- Key types must be valid for the signing / verification algorithm
##### Security fixes
- security: fixes `Arbitrary File Write via verify function` - CVE-2022-23529
- security: fixes `Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass` - CVE-2022-23540
- security: fixes `Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC` - CVE-2022-23541
- security: fixes `Unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage` - CVE-2022-23539
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
[ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.
This PR contains the following updates:
^8.5.1
->^9.0.0
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2022-23540
Overview
In versions
<=8.5.1
ofjsonwebtoken
library, lack of algorithm definition in thejwt.verify()
function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to thenone
algorithm for signature verification.Am I affected?
You will be affected if you do not specify algorithms in the
jwt.verify()
functionHow do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the
jwt.verify()
method.Will the fix impact my users?
There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the
none
algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that injwt.verify()
options.CVE-2022-23539
Overview
Versions
<=8.5.1
ofjsonwebtoken
library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm.Am I affected?
You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below
And for Elliptic Curve algorithms:
alg
How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, If you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the
allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes
option totrue
in thesign()
and/orverify()
functions.Will the fix impact my users?
There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you already use a valid secure combination of key type and algorithm. Otherwise, use the
allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes
option totrue
in thesign()
andverify()
functions to continue usage of invalid key type/algorithm combination in 9.0.0 for legacy compatibility.CVE-2022-23541
Overview
Versions
<=8.5.1
ofjsonwebtoken
library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to thesecretOrPublicKey
argument from the readme link) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens.Am I affected?
You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function.
How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0
Will the fix impact my users?
There is no impact for end users
CVE-2022-23529
Overview
For versions
<=8.5.1
ofjsonwebtoken
library, if a malicious actor has the ability to modify the key retrieval parameter (referring to thesecretOrPublicKey
argument from the readme link) of thejwt.verify()
function, they can gain remote code execution (RCE).Am I affected?
You are affected only if you allow untrusted entities to modify the key retrieval parameter of the
jwt.verify()
on a host that you control.How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0
Will the fix impact my users?
The fix has no impact on end users.
Credits
Palo Alto Networks
Release Notes
auth0/node-jsonwebtoken
### [`v9.0.0`](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#900---2022-12-21) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/compare/v8.5.1...v9.0.0) **Breaking changes: See [Migration from v8 to v9](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/wiki/Migration-Notes:-v8-to-v9)** ##### Breaking changes - Removed support for Node versions 11 and below. - The verify() function no longer accepts unsigned tokens by default. (\[[`8345030`](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/commit/834503079514b72264fd13023a3b8d648afd6a16)]https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/commit/834503079514b72264fd13023a3b8d648afd6a16) - RSA key size must be 2048 bits or greater. (\[[`ecdf6cc`](https://togithub.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/commit/ecdf6cc6073ea13a7e71df5fad043550f08d0fa6)]https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken/commit/ecdf6cc6073ea13a7e71df5fad043550f08d0fa6) - Key types must be valid for the signing / verification algorithm ##### Security fixes - security: fixes `Arbitrary File Write via verify function` - CVE-2022-23529 - security: fixes `Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass` - CVE-2022-23540 - security: fixes `Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC` - CVE-2022-23541 - security: fixes `Unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage` - CVE-2022-23539Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.