Closed weinbe2 closed 3 years ago
@detar FYI on some MG-specific bugfix changes here. This should be a clean merge otherwise.
@detar what's the status of you merging this into develop
?
Or at least into the feature/staggMG
branch in the MILC repo as opposed to my own? I saw some recent commits to develop
had MG-related content, which could become a merging headache...
Hi Evan,
I am not super fluent in git. The original PR pointed to an incorrect branch of milc-qcd. I merged those changes by hand at that time, and you have been using them. So that PR was still posted on the milc-qcd repo, but I thought it was stale. Your question suggests not. What is its current status?
I haven't touched feature/staggMG for a couple weeks. If your PR is still open and needed, I guess I should merge it with the feature/staggMG branch, then merge develop into feature/staggMG to resolve any conflicts, and finally, merge the result into develop, so we can close the feature/staggMG branch and work from develop from now on.
Best,
Carleton
On 7/29/20 1:31 PM, Evan Weinberg wrote:
@detar https://github.com/detar what's the status of you merging this into |develop|?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/milc-qcd/milc_qcd/pull/33#issuecomment-665858775, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABP6HXSXPOZXBZHG7LN2TT3R6B2JBANCNFSM4NZUYSYQ.
That PR was stale and I believe I got rid of it, this is a new PR.
I remember the difficulties you went through last time, so I checked carefully that this PR is merging into the milc-qcd repo's feature/staggMG
branch and not directly into develop
. I can make some time today to merge develop
into my branch so it'll be a clean one-two effort for you to merge this branch directly into MILC develop.
I went ahead and merged the PR. I'll reconcile milc-qcd:develop with milc-qcd:feature/staggMG next.
Thank you Carleton, yesterday got away from me.
This PR addresses a stray
}
that accidentally found its way into the first PR. It also replaced theCTIME =
withCTIME ?=
to streamline overridingCTIME
from the command line.