More match type logic

[kristinagalik]

@kubantjan len checkovacia otazka - ono to skor asi bolo myslene pre AntibodyMatchTypes nez pre MatchType, nie? lenze potom tie dve posledne odrazky HIGH_RES_WITH_SPLIT, HIGH_RES_WITH_BROAD vedia byt asi aj pre MatchType pre zistovanie CI ci to netreba riesit?

[kubantjan]

@kristinagalik plese write in english, this was due to historical reasons in czech, but we want to avoid that from now on.

• as I am reading it again, I think it makes sense to rewrite it a bit, I will do that below

but to your question, it all is just about antibody match types. Lets focus on that for the moment

[kubantjan]

At the moment we have the following antibody match types:

High res - match at high res level, the highest and the most sure type of match

• both typization and antibody is in split resolution and there is match Split - match at split level. Either:
• one of them was in higher res and the other in split
• antibodies are all in high res, but for given typization the test was not done and there is match on split level Broad - similar to split

This is not good enough. Plus there are some issues: 1) both typization and antibody is in split resolution and there is match make it split resolution, not high res as it is now. 2) Add other categories: Split_from_high_res:

• one of them was in higher res and the other in split
• antibodies are all in high res, but for given typization the test was not done and there is match on split level broad_from_high_res:
• one of them was in higher res and the other in broad
• antibodies are all in high res, but for given typization the test was not done and there is match on broad level Indecisible:
  • antibody exists against a typization group that the donor was not typizised for.

potom v tech kategoriich allowed crossmatch types predelat split_and_broad na to aby povolovat jen broad nebo split_with_high_res (ne split samotnej)