search

milonmaze / privacy-terms-observatory

Privacy Terms Observatory is an archive of published privacy and terms of popular websites.
3 stars 3 forks source link

about.linkedin.com #27

Open milonmaze opened 3 years ago

milonmaze commented 3 years ago

Tracking updates of about.linkedin.com

milonmaze commented 3 years ago

6fd48672f7b0e84f9bde884ee330f95e84864eb2: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2021-04-19

added new file

milonmaze commented 3 years ago

33b8b036a66c2b5d1a27839114e5c78a2b3b8399: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2021-04-19

added new file

milonmaze commented 3 years ago

dd327249e1fcff6e85e6d0466452820621c065ab: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2021-05-29

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index 9b39521..f23c82b 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -22,12 +22,11 @@ Government Requests Report

 This report discusses how we respond to government requests for member data and removal of content. As part of our commitment to a safe, trusted, and professional environment, we provide as much transparency as possible about government requests for member data and content removal we receive. We believe in free expression and try to minimize the impact of laws that negatively affect constructive, relevant speech.

-
 We respect the laws that apply to us in the countries where we operate. In the U.S., we respond to several types of legal process at the federal, state, and local levels. Most often, we’re responding to search warrants and subpoenas. Outside the U.S., we ask the government that’s requesting information to issue its request properly, for example through a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty or a form of international process known as a letter rogatory. Sometimes, we’ll make an exception in an emergency. For more information, see our Law Enforcement Data Request Guidelines.

 We never provide information to a government to fulfill a member data request without first trying to notify the individual member, except when applicable law prohibits us from doing so. We may make exceptions in certain emergencies.

-This report covers the six-month period between January 1 and June 30, 2020.
+This report covers the six-month period between July 1 and December 31, 2020.

 This report covers:
@@ -56,6 +55,52 @@ Requests by country
 2012
 2011
 Requests by country and accounts subject to those requests
+2020: July-December
+   Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
+   Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
+Argentina  4   4   0%  0
+Australia  4   5   50% 2
+Belgium
+   2   4   100%    4
+Brazil
+   4   4   50% 2
+Canada
+   1   1   100%    1
+China  2   2   0%  0
+Columbia
+   2   2   0%  0
+Czech Republic 1   1   0%  0
+Dominican Republic 1   1   0%  0
+Estonia    2   2   50% 1
+France
+   26  33  46% 14
+Georgia    1   1   0%  0
+Germany
+   50  82  50% 38
+India
+   29  32  0%  0
+Italy
+   7   8   57% 5 
+Monaco
+   1   1   100%    1
+Netherlands
+   16  33  69% 19
+Norway
+   1   1   100%    1
+Pakistan   1   1   0%  0
+Peru   1   1   0%  0
+Poland 2   2   0%  0
+Portugal   2   2   0%  0
+Serbia 2   3   0%  0
+Singapore  3   3   0%  0
+Slovenia   2   8   50% 2
+Spain  8   9   38% 3
+Sweden 1   1   100%    1
+Switzerland    3   3   67% 2
+United Kingdom 5   5   40% 1
+United States  364 1,420   76% 702
+Total  548 1,675   63% 799
+Requests by country and accounts subject to those requests
 2020: January-June
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
@@ -111,6 +156,18 @@ Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
 2015
 2014
 2013
+2020: July-December
+Requests [1]   364
+Accounts subject to requests   1,420
+Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 76%
+Subpoenas [2]  66%
+Search warrants [3]    11%
+Court orders [4]   22%
+Other [5]  1%
+National security letters received [6] 0-499
+National security letters (accounts subject to request)
+   0-499
+FISA letters [6]   0-499
 2020: January-June
 Requests [1]   377
 Accounts subject to requests   2,459
@@ -151,6 +208,12 @@ Government requests for content removal
 2019
 2018
 By country and action taken
+2020: July-December
+   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
+Turkey 5   4   80%
+China  24  22  92%
+Totals 29  26  89%
+By country and action taken
 2020: January-June
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
 US 1   1   100%
@@ -169,9 +232,9 @@ Professional Community Policies

 Law Enforcement Guidelines

-Strengthening our Professional Community Policies to Keep Members Safe
+Guide: Features to Help You Control Your Feed and Conversations

-New Features Help Keep it Professional
+Strengthening our Professional Community Policies to Keep Members Safe

 Our Commitment to Safe Conversations

@@ -181,6 +244,10 @@ Help Center: Recognizing and Reporting Scams

 Help Center: Government Requests for Data

+What We Mean by Equitable Outcomes for the Global Workforce
+
+Our approach to Responsible AI
+
 About
 Cookie Policy
 Privacy Policy
milonmaze commented 3 years ago

e0dfaf7a3f1a90d103614cec86a0e8edb562119a: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2021-05-29

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 6ac178c..350ccc1 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -20,18 +20,15 @@ Content removal requests
 Our Transparency Report

-We strive for transparency and accountability in the actions we take to protect our members, how we handle inquiries for member data, and how we respond to content removal requests. In the six months since our last report, we’ve seen more people than ever before using LinkedIn to share views, opinions, ideas and experiences. We’ve also seen an increase in our efforts to identify and remove abuse, and stop bad actors.
-
+We strive for transparency and accountability in the actions we take to protect our members, how we handle inquiries for member data, and how we respond to content removal requests. In the six months since our last report, we’ve seen more people than ever coming to LinkedIn to connect, learn new skills, create content, and find jobs. As more people come to LinkedIn, we continue to invest in technology and people to help stop and prevent abuse, and take action on those who misuse the platform to help keep members safe.

 Our semi-annual Transparency Report includes both a Community Report and a Government Requests Report.

-
 Community Report

 This describes how we enforce our User Agreement and Professional Community Policies for our members globally.

-
 Go to report
 Government Requests Report

@@ -46,9 +43,9 @@ Professional Community Policies

 Law Enforcement Guidelines

-Strengthening our Professional Community Policies to Keep Members Safe
+Guide: Features to Help You Control Your Feed and Conversations

-New Features Help Keep it Professional
+Strengthening our Professional Community Policies to Keep Members Safe

 Our Commitment to Safe Conversations

@@ -58,6 +55,12 @@ Help Center: Recognizing and Reporting Scams

 Help Center: Government Requests for Data

+What We Mean by Equitable Outcomes for the Global Workforce
+
+Our approach to Responsible AI
+
+ 
+
 About
 Cookie Policy
 Privacy Policy
milonmaze commented 3 years ago

4bc1e8d754bec912088022d901e2288399750411: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2021-09-04

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 350ccc1..014c6cd 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -1,22 +1,5 @@
 Skip to main content
 Close jump menu
-LinkedIn logo
-LinkedIn logo
-LinkedIn
-Transparency
-Community Report
-Community Report Menu
-Government Requests Report
-Government Requests Report Menu
-Community Report
-Fake accounts
-Spam and scams
-Content violations
-Copyright removal requests
-Government Requests Report
-Government requests for data
-U.S. government requests
-Content removal requests
 Our Transparency Report

@@ -37,7 +20,6 @@ This describes how we respond when governments around the world ask for member d

 Go to report
-Additional resources

 Professional Community Policies

@@ -61,11 +43,4 @@ Our approach to Responsible AI

  

-About
-Cookie Policy
-Privacy Policy
-User Agreement
-Accessibility
-LinkedIn logo
- © LinkedIn Corporation 2021
 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 3 years ago

183306a85bd59a1e6cb4d8c6f322465b450decbe: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2021-09-04

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index f23c82b..815e73e 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -1,22 +1,5 @@
 Skip to main content
 Close jump menu
-LinkedIn logo
-LinkedIn logo
-LinkedIn
-Transparency
-Community Report
-Community Report Menu
-Government Requests Report
-Government Requests Report Menu
-Community Report
-Fake accounts
-Spam and scams
-Content violations
-Copyright removal requests
-Government Requests Report
-Government requests for data
-U.S. government requests
-Content removal requests
 Government Requests Report

@@ -37,13 +20,10 @@ U.S. government requests for data

 Global content removal requests

-Government requests for data: global
 2022 - 2020
 2019 - 2017
 2016 - 2014
 2013 - 2011
-Requests in the U.S. and globally
-Requests by country
 2020
 2019
 2018
@@ -54,8 +34,6 @@ Requests by country
 2013
 2012
 2011
-Requests by country and accounts subject to those requests
-2020: July-December
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
 Argentina  4   4   0%  0
@@ -100,8 +78,6 @@ Switzerland  3   3   67% 2
 United Kingdom 5   5   40% 1
 United States  364 1,420   76% 702
 Total  548 1,675   63% 799
-Requests by country and accounts subject to those requests
-2020: January-June
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
 Belgium
@@ -156,7 +132,6 @@ Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
 2015
 2014
 2013
-2020: July-December
 Requests [1]   364
 Accounts subject to requests   1,420
 Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 76%
@@ -168,7 +143,6 @@ National security letters received [6]  0-499
 National security letters (accounts subject to request)
    0-499
 FISA letters [6]   0-499
-2020: January-June
 Requests [1]   377
 Accounts subject to requests   2,459
 Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 78%
@@ -207,14 +181,10 @@ Government requests for content removal
 2020
 2019
 2018
-By country and action taken
-2020: July-December
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
 Turkey 5   4   80%
 China  24  22  92%
 Totals 29  26  89%
-By country and action taken
-2020: January-June
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
 US 1   1   100%
 Turkey 2   2   100%
@@ -226,8 +196,6 @@ Totals  21  19  90%

 • Government Requests for Content Removal includes requests received by LinkedIn from governments reporting violations of our Terms of Service or violations of local law.

-Additional resources
-
 Professional Community Policies

 Law Enforcement Guidelines
@@ -248,11 +216,4 @@ What We Mean by Equitable Outcomes for the Global Workforce

 Our approach to Responsible AI

-About
-Cookie Policy
-Privacy Policy
-User Agreement
-Accessibility
-LinkedIn logo
- © LinkedIn Corporation 2021
 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 2 years ago

cb745e5c6a6a45eb837c0b74a7983da5dd56df3a: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2022-02-05

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 014c6cd..3b5f301 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Close jump menu
 Our Transparency Report

-We strive for transparency and accountability in the actions we take to protect our members, how we handle inquiries for member data, and how we respond to content removal requests. In the six months since our last report, we’ve seen more people than ever coming to LinkedIn to connect, learn new skills, create content, and find jobs. As more people come to LinkedIn, we continue to invest in technology and people to help stop and prevent abuse, and take action on those who misuse the platform to help keep members safe.
+We strive for transparency and accountability in the actions we take to protect our members, how we handle inquiries for member data, and how we respond to content removal requests. We continued to see record levels of engagement on the platform during this reporting period. As more people come to LinkedIn to connect to economic opportunity, we continue to invest in technology and people to help stop and prevent abuse, and take action on those who misuse the platform.

 Our semi-annual Transparency Report includes both a Community Report and a Government Requests Report.
milonmaze commented 2 years ago

95dda7d33539c15dca42bfecf2d8e0b3422a8d4c: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2022-02-05

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index 815e73e..51cc8fb 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ We respect the laws that apply to us in the countries where we operate. In the U

 We never provide information to a government to fulfill a member data request without first trying to notify the individual member, except when applicable law prohibits us from doing so. We may make exceptions in certain emergencies.

-This report covers the six-month period between July 1 and December 31, 2020.
+This report covers the six-month period between January 1 and June 30, 2021.

 This report covers:
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Global content removal requests
 2019 - 2017
 2016 - 2014
 2013 - 2011
+2021
 2020
 2019
 2018
@@ -33,88 +34,50 @@ Global content removal requests
 2014
 2013
 2012
-2011
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
-Argentina  4   4   0%  0
-Australia  4   5   50% 2
+Argentina  1   1   0%  0
 Belgium
-   2   4   100%    4
+   4   4   0%  4
 Brazil
-   4   4   50% 2
+   3   6   0%  0
 Canada
-   1   1   100%    1
-China  2   2   0%  0
-Columbia
-   2   2   0%  0
-Czech Republic 1   1   0%  0
-Dominican Republic 1   1   0%  0
-Estonia    2   2   50% 1
+   4   4   100%    4
+Chile  2   2   0%  0
+China  5   5   80% 4
+Colombia
+   1   1   0%  0
 France
-   26  33  46% 14
-Georgia    1   1   0%  0
+   56  74  73% 47
 Germany
-   50  82  50% 38
+   62  70  77% 52
+Greece 1   1   100%    1
+Hungary    1   1   100%    1
 India
-   29  32  0%  0
+   30  37  0%  0
+Ireland    6   6   33% 2
 Italy
-   7   8   57% 5 
+   23  36  61% 17 
+Mexico 2   2   0%  0
 Monaco
    1   1   100%    1
 Netherlands
-   16  33  69% 19
-Norway
-   1   1   100%    1
+   21  28  76% 18
+Nigeria
+   1   1   0%  0
 Pakistan   1   1   0%  0
-Peru   1   1   0%  0
-Poland 2   2   0%  0
-Portugal   2   2   0%  0
-Serbia 2   3   0%  0
-Singapore  3   3   0%  0
-Slovenia   2   8   50% 2
-Spain  8   9   38% 3
+Peru   3   3   100%    3
+Poland 3   3   0%  0
+Portugal   4   4   0%  0
+Singapore  1   1   0%  0
+Slovenia   2   2   0%  0
+South Korea    1   1   0%  0
+Spain  9   10  33% 3
 Sweden 1   1   100%    1
-Switzerland    3   3   67% 2
-United Kingdom 5   5   40% 1
-United States  364 1,420   76% 702
-Total  548 1,675   63% 799
-   Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
-   Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
-Belgium
-   1   1   0%  0
-Brazil
-   5   5   80% 4
-Canada
-   1   1   100%    1
-Columbia
-   1   1   0%  0
-Finland
-   1   1   0%  0
-France
-   13  16  62% 10
-Germany
-   62  92  74% 63
-Greece
-   2   2   0%  0
-India
-   11  14  0%  0
-Italy
-   3   4   100%    4    
-Malta
-   2   2   0%  0
-Netherlands
-   7   11  86% 9
-Poland
-   1   7   0%  0
-Portugal   1   1   0%  0
-Serbia 1   1   0%  0
-Singapore  3   5   33% 2
-Slovenia   1   2   0%  0
-Spain  4   4   25% 1
-Switzerland    2   2   0%  0
-United Kingdom 10  11  30% 3
-United States  377 2,459   78% 1,862
-Total  509 2,642   72% 1,959
+Switzerland    2   2   50% 1
+United Kingdom 12  15  58% 9
+United States  362 2349    83% 901
+Total  625 2672    72% 1069

 [1] This column was previously labeled "Accounts Impacted", but we changed the name to clarify that it reflects the number of accounts subject to the data requests, and not the number of accounts for which some responsive data was in fact provided.

@@ -124,6 +87,7 @@ Total    509 2,642   72% 1,959
 [3] Request(s) issued through Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) process, 2015: January-June.

 Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
+2021
 2020
 2019
 2018
@@ -132,23 +96,12 @@ Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
 2015
 2014
 2013
-Requests [1]   364
-Accounts subject to requests   1,420
-Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 76%
-Subpoenas [2]  66%
-Search warrants [3]    11%
-Court orders [4]   22%
-Other [5]  1%
-National security letters received [6] 0-499
-National security letters (accounts subject to request)
-   0-499
-FISA letters [6]   0-499
-Requests [1]   377
-Accounts subject to requests   2,459
-Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 78%
-Subpoenas [2]  63%
-Search warrants [3]    11%
-Court orders [4]   25%
+Requests [1]   362
+Accounts subject to requests   2,349
+Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 83%
+Subpoenas [2]  70%
+Search warrants [3]    9%
+Court orders [4]   21%
 Other [5]  1%
 National security letters received [6] 0-499
 National security letters (accounts subject to request)
@@ -178,18 +131,15 @@ FISA letters [6]  0-499
 [6] In our Government Requests Reports prior to July 2019, we reported on National Security Requests, which could include NSLs and FISA orders. In the effort to provide more transparency to our members, we plan to report on National Security Letters and FISA orders separately. Because we are required by law to delay the release of FISA data by 6 months, data for the July-December 2019 period is included in our January-June 2020 report.

 Government requests for content removal
+2021
 2020
 2019
 2018
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
-Turkey 5   4   80%
-China  24  22  92%
-Totals 29  26  89%
-   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
-US 1   1   100%
-Turkey 2   2   100%
-China  18  16  89%
-Totals 21  19  90%
+China  31  30  97%
+India  7   4   57%
+Turkey 24  23  96%
+Totals 62  57  92%

 • We started reporting on content-related requests in our January 1-June 30, 2018 Transparency Report.
milonmaze commented 2 years ago

6ff1878d9e43fc0305b27be61edd23d400aabccc: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2022-06-04

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index 51cc8fb..895ed63 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ We respect the laws that apply to us in the countries where we operate. In the U

 We never provide information to a government to fulfill a member data request without first trying to notify the individual member, except when applicable law prohibits us from doing so. We may make exceptions in certain emergencies.

-This report covers the six-month period between January 1 and June 30, 2021.
+This report covers the six-month period between July 1 and December 31, 2021.

 This report covers:
@@ -34,6 +34,41 @@ Global content removal requests
 2014
 2013
 2012
+   Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
+   Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
+Argentina  4   4   0%  0
+Australia  1   1   0%  0
+Belgium
+   8   9   50% 5
+Canada
+   1   1   0%  0
+China  4   4   50% 2
+Czech Republic
+   1   1   100%    1
+France
+   37  43  65% 27
+Germany
+   79  92  77% 69
+Greece 3   3   33% 1
+Hungary    1   1   0%  0
+India
+   46  49  0%  0
+Ireland    1   1   0%  0
+Italy
+   8   9   0%  0
+Malta  1   1   0%  0
+Mexico 1   1   0%  0
+Netherlands
+   11  23  82% 12
+New Zealand
+   1   1   100%    1
+Poland 5   5   20% 1
+Singapore  1   1   0%  0
+Spain  12  12  33% 4
+Switzerland    6   6   67% 4
+United Kingdom 15  20  47% 8
+United States  302 1190    83% 676
+Total  549 1478    67% 811
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
 Argentina  1   1   0%  0
@@ -96,6 +131,17 @@ Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
 2015
 2014
 2013
+Requests [1]   302
+Accounts subject to requests   1,190
+Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 83%
+Subpoenas [2]  73%
+Search warrants [3]    9%
+Court orders [4]   18%
+Other [5]  1%
+National security letters received [6] 0-499
+National security letters (accounts subject to request)
+   0-499
+FISA letters [6]   0-499
 Requests [1]   362
 Accounts subject to requests   2,349
 Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 83%
@@ -136,6 +182,11 @@ Government requests for content removal
 2019
 2018
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
+China  12  12  100%
+India  5   4   80%
+Turkey 10  10  100%
+Totals 27  26  96%
+   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
 China  31  30  97%
 India  7   4   57%
 Turkey 24  23  96%
@@ -150,13 +201,9 @@ Professional Community Policies

 Law Enforcement Guidelines

-Guide: Features to Help You Control Your Feed and Conversations
+How our content abuse systems work to keep members safe

-Strengthening our Professional Community Policies to Keep Members Safe
-
-Our Commitment to Safe Conversations
-
-Working to Keep Our Community Safe, Trusted, and Professional
+How we address inauthentic activity

 Help Center: Recognizing and Reporting Scams

@@ -166,4 +213,6 @@ What We Mean by Equitable Outcomes for the Global Workforce

 Our approach to Responsible AI

+Keeping your feed relevant and productive
+
 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 2 years ago

9806563d18cb782d0622d76198d7a46f99355f76: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2022-06-11

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index 895ed63..e89efa5 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ Argentina 4   4   0%  0
 Australia  1   1   0%  0
 Belgium
    8   9   50% 5
+Brazil*    3   6   100%    6
 Canada
    1   1   0%  0
 China  4   4   50% 2
@@ -68,7 +69,10 @@ Spain    12  12  33% 4
 Switzerland    6   6   67% 4
 United Kingdom 15  20  47% 8
 United States  302 1190    83% 676
-Total  549 1478    67% 811
+Total  552 1484    67% 817
+
+*An earlier version of this report inadvertently omitted the data shown in the table above for Brazilian requests made to LinkedIn during the reporting period of July through December 2021.
+
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
 Argentina  1   1   0%  0
milonmaze commented 2 years ago

592b6542c75c931bce713c058b8093f9f2f288bf: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2022-09-10

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 3b5f301..7b7a20b 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -1,46 +1,130 @@
 Skip to main content
 Close jump menu
-Our Transparency Report

+Our Transparency Center

-We strive for transparency and accountability in the actions we take to protect our members, how we handle inquiries for member data, and how we respond to content removal requests. We continued to see record levels of engagement on the platform during this reporting period. As more people come to LinkedIn to connect to economic opportunity, we continue to invest in technology and people to help stop and prevent abuse, and take action on those who misuse the platform.
-
-Our semi-annual Transparency Report includes both a Community Report and a Government Requests Report.
+We work to keep LinkedIn safe, trusted, and professional. We  provide our members with regular transparency updates on the actions we take to protect members, how we handle questions about member data, and how we respond to content removal requests. 

 Community Report

-This describes how we enforce our User Agreement and Professional Community Policies for our members globally.
+
+
+How we enforce our User Agreement and Professional Community Policies for our members globally.

 Go to report
-Government Requests Report

+Government Requests Report

-This describes how we respond when governments around the world ask for member data or for content to be removed.

+How we respond when governments ask for member data or for content to be removed.

 Go to report

+Members
+
+Ads transparency and controls
+
+Government requests
+
 Professional Community Policies

-Law Enforcement Guidelines

-Guide: Features to Help You Control Your Feed and Conversations
+See the rules of our community that we need everyone to follow.
+
+Visit webpage →
+
+
+Updates to our Professional Community Policies
+
+
+Learn about recent updates we’ve made to our policies. 
+
+Read blog post →
+
+How our content abuse defense systems work
+
+
+Layers of protection help us detect and remove inappropriate content.
+
+Read blog post →
+
+Keeping your feed relevant and productive
+
+
+Investments we’ve made in the feed content experience.
+
+Read blog post  →
+
+How we address fake profiles
+
+
+
+
+Actions we take to keep you safe while engaging with the community.
+
+Read blog post →
+
+Improving the quality of jobs
+
+
+
+
+How we’re keeping the job-search experience easy, safe, and effective.
+
+Read blog post →
+
+Safety Series: What is scraping?
+
+
+We define what it is (and isn’t), what we’re doing about it, and what members can do.
+
+Read blog post →
+
+How to report inappropriate content
+
+Let us know about any content that may violate our Professional Community Policies through our Help Center.
+
+Our approach to brand safety
+
+
+How we create a safe and trusted experience for customers.
+
+Read blog post →
+
+Why am I seeing this ad?
+
+
+How our ads settings and targeting works for you.
+
+Read blog post →
+
+Brand safety standards for your campaigns
+
+
+Trusted publishers help customers reach their audiences through ad campaigns.
+
+Go to Help Center →
+
+Government requests for data
+
+
+We respect the laws that apply to us and put our members first by requiring government requests follow established legal procedures.
+
+Go to Help Center →

-Strengthening our Professional Community Policies to Keep Members Safe
+Law enforcement guidelines

-Our Commitment to Safe Conversations

-Working to Keep Our Community Safe, Trusted, and Professional
+The process we follow for law enforcement data requests, and our approach to transparency.

-Help Center: Recognizing and Reporting Scams
+Go to Help Center →

-Help Center: Government Requests for Data
+Report defamation and copyright / trademark infringement

-What We Mean by Equitable Outcomes for the Global Workforce

-Our approach to Responsible AI
+We require information posted by members to be accurate, lawful, and not in violation of the rights of others.

- 
+Go to Help Center →

 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 1 year ago

0686bac77243269c2dca5ca6302123a86dcb94c3: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2022-10-15

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 7b7a20b..8cb5bda 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -8,6 +8,13 @@ We work to keep LinkedIn safe, trusted, and professional. We  provide our membe
 Community Report

+How we enforce our User Agreement and Professional Community Policies for our members globally.
+
+Go to report
+
+Community Report
+
+

 How we enforce our User Agreement and Professional Community Policies for our members globally.
milonmaze commented 1 year ago

712bc8385fda144b53a244b8d881c579e393f0f5: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2022-12-10

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index e89efa52..c5d96237 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ We respect the laws that apply to us in the countries where we operate. In the U

 We never provide information to a government to fulfill a member data request without first trying to notify the individual member, except when applicable law prohibits us from doing so. We may make exceptions in certain emergencies.

-This report covers the six-month period between July 1 and December 31, 2021.
+This report covers the six-month period between January 1 and June 30, 2022.

 This report covers:
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Global content removal requests
 2019 - 2017
 2016 - 2014
 2013 - 2011
+2022
 2021
 2020
 2019
@@ -33,99 +34,61 @@ Global content removal requests
 2015
 2014
 2013
-2012
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
-Argentina  4   4   0%  0
+Argentina  3   3   0%  0
 Australia  1   1   0%  0
+Austria    2   2   0%  0
 Belgium
-   8   9   50% 5
-Brazil*    3   6   100%    6
+   6   13  100%    10
+Brazil 12  35  50% 7
 Canada
-   1   1   0%  0
-China  4   4   50% 2
-Czech Republic
-   1   1   100%    1
+   5   7   80% 6
+China  6   6   33% 2
+Costa Rica
+   1   5   0%  0
+Denmark    2   3   100%    2
+Finland    1   1   0%  0
 France
-   37  43  65% 27
+   22  35  73% 24
+Georgia    1   1   0%  0
 Germany
-   79  92  77% 69
-Greece 3   3   33% 1
-Hungary    1   1   0%  0
+   68  81  75% 52
+Hungary    2   3   50% 1
 India
-   46  49  0%  0
-Ireland    1   1   0%  0
+   64  84  8%  5
+Ireland    5   5   20% 1
 Italy
-   8   9   0%  0
-Malta  1   1   0%  0
-Mexico 1   1   0%  0
-Netherlands
-   11  23  82% 12
-New Zealand
-   1   1   100%    1
-Poland 5   5   20% 1
-Singapore  1   1   0%  0
-Spain  12  12  33% 4
-Switzerland    6   6   67% 4
-United Kingdom 15  20  47% 8
-United States  302 1190    83% 676
-Total  552 1484    67% 817
-
-*An earlier version of this report inadvertently omitted the data shown in the table above for Brazilian requests made to LinkedIn during the reporting period of July through December 2021.
-
-   Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
-   Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
-Argentina  1   1   0%  0
-Belgium
-   4   4   0%  4
-Brazil
-   3   6   0%  0
-Canada
-   4   4   100%    4
-Chile  2   2   0%  0
-China  5   5   80% 4
-Colombia
-   1   1   0%  0
-France
-   56  74  73% 47
-Germany
-   62  70  77% 52
-Greece 1   1   100%    1
-Hungary    1   1   100%    1
-India
-   30  37  0%  0
-Ireland    6   6   33% 2
-Italy
-   23  36  61% 17 
+   11  23  73% 14
+Jordan 1   2   0%  0
+Malta  3   3   0%  0
 Mexico 2   2   0%  0
-Monaco
-   1   1   100%    1
+Monaco 1   2   100%    1
+Nepal  1   1   0%  0
 Netherlands
-   21  28  76% 18
-Nigeria
+   10  75  40% 9
+New Zealand
    1   1   0%  0
-Pakistan   1   1   0%  0
-Peru   3   3   100%    3
-Poland 3   3   0%  0
-Portugal   4   4   0%  0
+Peru   1   1   0%  0
+Poland 3   3   33% 1
+Portugal   2   4   50% 1
+Romania    1   1   0%  0
 Singapore  1   1   0%  0
-Slovenia   2   2   0%  0
-South Korea    1   1   0%  0
-Spain  9   10  33% 3
-Sweden 1   1   100%    1
-Switzerland    2   2   50% 1
-United Kingdom 12  15  58% 9
-United States  362 2349    83% 901
-Total  625 2672    72% 1069
+Spain  11  12  36% 5
+Switzerland    5   5   20% 1
+United Arab Emirates   1   1   0%  0
+United Kingdom 21  24  43% 11
+United States  327 1114    81% 572
+Total  604 1560    64% 725

 [1] This column was previously labeled "Accounts Impacted", but we changed the name to clarify that it reflects the number of accounts subject to the data requests, and not the number of accounts for which some responsive data was in fact provided.

 [2] We started reporting the number of accounts for which at least some data was provided in response to government requests in our January-June 2014 Transparency Report.

-[3] Request(s) issued through Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) process, 2015: January-June.

 Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
+2022
 2021
 2020
 2019
@@ -135,28 +98,17 @@ Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
 2015
 2014
 2013
-Requests [1]   302
-Accounts subject to requests   1,190
-Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 83%
-Subpoenas [2]  73%
-Search warrants [3]    9%
-Court orders [4]   18%
-Other [5]  1%
+Requests [1]   327
+Accounts subject to requests   1,114
+Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 81%
+Subpoenas [2]  76%
+Search warrants [3]    10%
+Court orders [4]   14%
+Other [5]  <1%
 National security letters received [6] 0-499
 National security letters (accounts subject to request)
    0-499
-FISA letters [6]   0-499
-Requests [1]   362
-Accounts subject to requests   2,349
-Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 83%
-Subpoenas [2]  70%
-Search warrants [3]    9%
-Court orders [4]   21%
-Other [5]  1%
-National security letters received [6] 0-499
-National security letters (accounts subject to request)
-   0-499
-FISA letters [6]   0-499
+FISA requests [6]  0-499

 [1] U.S. Government Requests for Member Data include all requests received by LinkedIn from the U.S. government except for national security-related requests, such as National Security Letters and requests under the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), if any.

@@ -178,23 +130,25 @@ FISA letters [6]  0-499

-[6] In our Government Requests Reports prior to July 2019, we reported on National Security Requests, which could include NSLs and FISA orders. In the effort to provide more transparency to our members, we plan to report on National Security Letters and FISA orders separately. Because we are required by law to delay the release of FISA data by 6 months, data for the July-December 2019 period is included in our January-June 2020 report.
+[6] In our Government Requests Reports prior to July 2019, we reported on National Security Requests, which could include National Security Letters and FISA requests. In the effort to provide more transparency to our members, we now report NLSs and FISA requests separately. Because we are required by law to delay the release of FISA data by 6 months, reported FISA request metrics correspond to the previous reporting period (for example, data for the July-December 2019 period is reported in our January-June 2020 report).

 Government requests for content removal
+2022
 2021
 2020
 2019
 2018
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
-China  12  12  100%
-India  5   4   80%
-Turkey 10  10  100%
-Totals 27  26  96%
-   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
-China  31  30  97%
-India  7   4   57%
-Turkey 24  23  96%
-Totals 62  57  92%
+Australia  1   1   100%
+Brazil 1   1   100%
+France 1   1   100%
+Germany    1   1   100%
+Ghana  1   0   0%
+India  12  10  83%
+Monaco 1   0   0%
+Turkey 8   8   100%
+UK 1   1   100%
+Totals 27  23  85%

 • We started reporting on content-related requests in our January 1-June 30, 2018 Transparency Report.

@@ -205,18 +159,16 @@ Professional Community Policies

 Law Enforcement Guidelines

+Updates to our Professional Community Policies
+
 How our content abuse systems work to keep members safe

-How we address inauthentic activity
+Working together to keep LinkedIn safe

-Help Center: Recognizing and Reporting Scams
+New profile features to help verify identity and boost authenticity

 Help Center: Government Requests for Data

-What We Mean by Equitable Outcomes for the Global Workforce
-
 Our approach to Responsible AI

-Keeping your feed relevant and productive
-
 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 1 year ago

651ca1486091e306aa032ba5bad4a85277851f92: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2023-02-18

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 8cb5bda..22b0d16 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ Layers of protection help us detect and remove inappropriate content.

 Read blog post →

+Misinformation and inauthentic behavior
+
+
+Resources to assist members in identifying trustworthy content.
+
+Read  →
+
 Keeping your feed relevant and productive
milonmaze commented 1 year ago

146bcd49e35f0a75b03f298dddddf20bfc9e41ec: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2023-04-22

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index c5d9623..2838bbb 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ We respect the laws that apply to us in the countries where we operate. In the U

 We never provide information to a government to fulfill a member data request without first trying to notify the individual member, except when applicable law prohibits us from doing so. We may make exceptions in certain emergencies.

-This report covers the six-month period between January 1 and June 30, 2022.
+This report covers the six-month period between July 1 and December 31, 2022.

 This report covers:
@@ -34,6 +34,41 @@ Global content removal requests
 2015
 2014
 2013
+   Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
+   Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
+Argentina  1   23  0%  0
+Austria    1   1   100%    1
+Belgium
+   2   2   100%    2
+Brazil 22  34  59% 13
+Canada
+   3   3   33% 1
+China  2   4   50% 1
+Czech Republic 1   1   100%    1
+France
+   21  23  71% 15
+Germany
+   54  63  78% 48
+India
+   65  134 26% 21
+Ireland    1   1   0%  0
+Italy
+   34  34  44% 15
+Jordan 2   2   0%  0
+Netherlands
+   5   50  100%    48
+Pakistan
+   1   1   0%  0
+Poland 1   1   0%  0
+Portugal   1   3   0%  0
+Romania    1   1   0%  0
+Spain  10  15  70% 12
+Switzerland    2   3   0%  0
+Turkey 1   1   100%    1
+United Kingdom 27  45  44% 17
+United States  391 2636    80% 949
+Venezuela  1   1   0%  0
+Total  649 3081    69% 1144
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
 Argentina  3   3   0%  0
@@ -98,6 +133,17 @@ Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
 2015
 2014
 2013
+Requests [1]   391
+Accounts subject to requests   2,636
+Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 80%
+Subpoenas [2]  77%
+Search warrants [3]    7%
+Court orders [4]   15%
+Other [5]  1%
+National security letters received [6] 0-499
+National security letters (accounts subject to request)
+   0-499
+FISA requests [6]  0-499
 Requests [1]   327
 Accounts subject to requests   1,114
 Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 81%
@@ -139,6 +185,13 @@ Government requests for content removal
 2019
 2018
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
+Australia  2   2   100%
+Canada 1   1   100%
+India  6   4   67%
+Indonesia  4   4   100%
+Turkey 10  9   90%
+Totals 23  20  87%
+   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
 Australia  1   1   100%
 Brazil 1   1   100%
 France 1   1   100%
@@ -165,10 +218,10 @@ How our content abuse systems work to keep members safe

 Working together to keep LinkedIn safe

-New profile features to help verify identity and boost authenticity
-
 Help Center: Government Requests for Data

 Our approach to Responsible AI

+Responsible AI Principles
+
 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 1 year ago

64d60852289e0f2de2edaee13fbb6350d2da5488: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2023-07-22

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 22b0d16..9afaa80 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Close jump menu

 Our Transparency Center

-We work to keep LinkedIn safe, trusted, and professional. We  provide our members with regular transparency updates on the actions we take to protect members, how we handle questions about member data, and how we respond to content removal requests. 
+We work to keep LinkedIn safe, trusted, and professional. We provide our members with regular transparency updates on the actions we take to protect members, how we handle questions about member data, and how we respond to content removal requests. 

 Community Report

@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ The process we follow for law enforcement data requests, and our approach to tra

 Go to Help Center →

-Report defamation and copyright / trademark infringement
+Report copyright and trademark infringement

 We require information posted by members to be accurate, lawful, and not in violation of the rights of others.
milonmaze commented 1 year ago

8c45e1faad4163c019e869c4c9c3be9cc2af64a6: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2023-08-05

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 9afaa80..3446346 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -106,11 +106,21 @@ How we create a safe and trusted experience for customers.

 Read blog post →

+Ad Library
+
+
+Explore a searchable collection of ads that have run on LinkedIn.
+
+Go to Ad Library →
+
 Why am I seeing this ad?

+
+
 How our ads settings and targeting works for you.

+
 Read blog post →

 Brand safety standards for your campaigns
@@ -120,6 +130,7 @@ Trusted publishers help customers reach their audiences through ad campaigns.

 Go to Help Center →

+
 Government requests for data
milonmaze commented 1 year ago

9b368e7fa5886b090f3d9e601b75ad044d674f37: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2023-08-26

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 3446346..9ff7875 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -49,11 +49,20 @@ Learn about recent updates we’ve made to our policies. 

 Read blog post →

+Report copyright and trademark infringement
+
+
+We require information posted by members to be accurate, lawful, and not in violation of the rights of others.
+
+Go to Help Center →
+
 How our content abuse defense systems work

 Layers of protection help us detect and remove inappropriate content.

+
+
 Read blog post →

 Misinformation and inauthentic behavior
@@ -61,6 +70,8 @@ Misinformation and inauthentic behavior

 Resources to assist members in identifying trustworthy content.

+
+
 Read  →

 Keeping your feed relevant and productive
@@ -68,6 +79,8 @@ Keeping your feed relevant and productive

 Investments we’ve made in the feed content experience.

+
+
 Read blog post  →

 How we address fake profiles
@@ -77,6 +90,7 @@ How we address fake profiles

 Actions we take to keep you safe while engaging with the community.

+
 Read blog post →

 Improving the quality of jobs
@@ -86,6 +100,7 @@ Improving the quality of jobs

 How we’re keeping the job-search experience easy, safe, and effective.

+
 Read blog post →

 Safety Series: What is scraping?
@@ -145,10 +160,10 @@ The process we follow for law enforcement data requests, and our approach to tra

 Go to Help Center →

-Report copyright and trademark infringement
+How to contact LinkedIn under the DSA

-We require information posted by members to be accurate, lawful, and not in violation of the rights of others.
+How to contact LinkedIn's single point of contact in connection with the Digital Services Act.

 Go to Help Center →
milonmaze commented 11 months ago

3fd61d87644d7b7ecdaf6bec925e718f5217cba1: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2023-10-14

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index 2838bbb..93c2001 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@ Close jump menu
 Government Requests Report

-This report discusses how we respond to government requests for member data and removal of content. As part of our commitment to a safe, trusted, and professional environment, we provide as much transparency as possible about government requests for member data and content removal we receive. We believe in free expression and try to minimize the impact of laws that negatively affect constructive, relevant speech.
+This report discusses how we respond to government requests for member data and removal of content. As part of our commitment to a safe, trusted, and professional environment, we provide transparency about government requests for member data and content removal we receive. We believe in free expression and try to minimize the impact of laws that negatively affect constructive, relevant speech.

 We respect the laws that apply to us in the countries where we operate. In the U.S., we respond to several types of legal process at the federal, state, and local levels. Most often, we’re responding to search warrants and subpoenas. Outside the U.S., we ask the government that’s requesting information to issue its request properly, for example through a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty or a form of international process known as a letter rogatory. Sometimes, we’ll make an exception in an emergency. For more information, see our Law Enforcement Data Request Guidelines.

 We never provide information to a government to fulfill a member data request without first trying to notify the individual member, except when applicable law prohibits us from doing so. We may make exceptions in certain emergencies.

-This report covers the six-month period between July 1 and December 31, 2022.
+This report covers the six-month period between January 1 and June 30, 2023.

 This report covers:
@@ -20,10 +20,12 @@ U.S. government requests for data

 Global content removal requests

+2025 - 2023
 2022 - 2020
 2019 - 2017
 2016 - 2014
 2013 - 2011
+2023
 2022
 2021
 2020
@@ -33,88 +35,50 @@ Global content removal requests
 2016
 2015
 2014
-2013
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
-Argentina  1   23  0%  0
-Austria    1   1   100%    1
-Belgium
-   2   2   100%    2
-Brazil 22  34  59% 13
+Argentina  2   2   0%  0
+Australia  2   3   50% 1
+Austria    6   7   0%  0
+Bangladesh
+   1   1   0%  0
+Belgium    4   5   100%    4
+Bolivia    1   2   0%  0
+Brazil 18  20  44% 8
 Canada
-   3   3   33% 1
-China  2   4   50% 1
+   8   10  75% 8
+Chile  1   1   0%  0
+China  3   0   0%  0
+Columbia   2   2   0%  0
 Czech Republic 1   1   100%    1
+Estonia    2   2   0%  0
+Finland    1   2   0%  0
 France
-   21  23  71% 15
+   63  68  57% 39
 Germany
-   54  63  78% 48
+   65  102 82% 64
+Greece 3   3   33% 1
+Hungary    1   1   100%    1
 India
-   65  134 26% 21
-Ireland    1   1   0%  0
+   81  116 21% 19
+Ireland    12  12  58% 7
 Italy
-   34  34  44% 15
-Jordan 2   2   0%  0
+   103 250 43% 88
+Malta  1   1   0%  0
+Mexico 7   8   0%  0
 Netherlands
-   5   50  100%    48
-Pakistan
-   1   1   0%  0
-Poland 1   1   0%  0
-Portugal   1   3   0%  0
-Romania    1   1   0%  0
-Spain  10  15  70% 12
-Switzerland    2   3   0%  0
-Turkey 1   1   100%    1
-United Kingdom 27  45  44% 17
-United States  391 2636    80% 949
+   21  54  95% 52
+Poland 8   21  38% 3
+Portugal   2   2   50% 1
+Romania    1   4   0%  0
+Singapore  2   2   0%  0
+Spain  16  17  44% 7
+Switzerland    2   2   0%  0
+Taiwan 1   1   0%  0
+United Kingdom 17  22  53% 10
+United States  386 2053    83% 1306
 Venezuela  1   1   0%  0
-Total  649 3081    69% 1144
-   Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
-   Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
-Argentina  3   3   0%  0
-Australia  1   1   0%  0
-Austria    2   2   0%  0
-Belgium
-   6   13  100%    10
-Brazil 12  35  50% 7
-Canada
-   5   7   80% 6
-China  6   6   33% 2
-Costa Rica
-   1   5   0%  0
-Denmark    2   3   100%    2
-Finland    1   1   0%  0
-France
-   22  35  73% 24
-Georgia    1   1   0%  0
-Germany
-   68  81  75% 52
-Hungary    2   3   50% 1
-India
-   64  84  8%  5
-Ireland    5   5   20% 1
-Italy
-   11  23  73% 14
-Jordan 1   2   0%  0
-Malta  3   3   0%  0
-Mexico 2   2   0%  0
-Monaco 1   2   100%    1
-Nepal  1   1   0%  0
-Netherlands
-   10  75  40% 9
-New Zealand
-   1   1   0%  0
-Peru   1   1   0%  0
-Poland 3   3   33% 1
-Portugal   2   4   50% 1
-Romania    1   1   0%  0
-Singapore  1   1   0%  0
-Spain  11  12  36% 5
-Switzerland    5   5   20% 1
-United Arab Emirates   1   1   0%  0
-United Kingdom 21  24  43% 11
-United States  327 1114    81% 572
-Total  604 1560    64% 725
+Total  845 2798    64% 1620

 [1] This column was previously labeled "Accounts Impacted", but we changed the name to clarify that it reflects the number of accounts subject to the data requests, and not the number of accounts for which some responsive data was in fact provided.

@@ -123,6 +87,7 @@ Total    604 1560    64% 725

 Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
+2023
 2022
 2021
 2020
@@ -132,25 +97,13 @@ Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
 2016
 2015
 2014
-2013
-Requests [1]   391
-Accounts subject to requests   2,636
-Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 80%
-Subpoenas [2]  77%
-Search warrants [3]    7%
-Court orders [4]   15%
-Other [5]  1%
-National security letters received [6] 0-499
-National security letters (accounts subject to request)
-   0-499
-FISA requests [6]  0-499
-Requests [1]   327
-Accounts subject to requests   1,114
-Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 81%
+Requests [1]   386
+Accounts subject to requests   2,053
+Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 83%
 Subpoenas [2]  76%
-Search warrants [3]    10%
-Court orders [4]   14%
-Other [5]  <1%
+Search warrants [3]    6%
+Court orders [4]   17%
+Other [5]  1%
 National security letters received [6] 0-499
 National security letters (accounts subject to request)
    0-499
@@ -179,34 +132,33 @@ FISA requests [6] 0-499
 [6] In our Government Requests Reports prior to July 2019, we reported on National Security Requests, which could include National Security Letters and FISA requests. In the effort to provide more transparency to our members, we now report NLSs and FISA requests separately. Because we are required by law to delay the release of FISA data by 6 months, reported FISA request metrics correspond to the previous reporting period (for example, data for the July-December 2019 period is reported in our January-June 2020 report).

 Government requests for content removal
+2023
 2022
 2021
 2020
 2019
 2018
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
-Australia  2   2   100%
-Canada 1   1   100%
-India  6   4   67%
-Indonesia  4   4   100%
-Turkey 10  9   90%
-Totals 23  20  87%
-   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
-Australia  1   1   100%
-Brazil 1   1   100%
-France 1   1   100%
-Germany    1   1   100%
-Ghana  1   0   0%
-India  12  10  83%
-Monaco 1   0   0%
-Turkey 8   8   100%
-UK 1   1   100%
-Totals 27  23  85%
+Australia  2   1   50%
+Bahrain    1   0   0%
+Bangladesh 1   1   100%
+Bolivia    1   1   100%
+Brazil 4   4   100%
+China  5   4   80%
+Ghana  1   1   100%
+India  13  12  92%
+Indonesia  8   8   100%
+Qatar  1   0   0%
+Singapore  1   1   100%
+Turkey 5   5   100%
+United Kingdom 1   1   100%
+United States  5   5   100%
+Totals 49  44  90%

 • We started reporting on content-related requests in our January 1-June 30, 2018 Transparency Report.

-• Government Requests for Content Removal includes requests received by LinkedIn from governments reporting violations of our Terms of Service or violations of local law.
+• Government Requests for Content Removal are requests received by LinkedIn from governments seeking the removal of content, including reporting violations of our Terms of Service or violations of local law.

 Professional Community Policies

@@ -216,12 +168,12 @@ Updates to our Professional Community Policies

 How our content abuse systems work to keep members safe

-Working together to keep LinkedIn safe
-
 Help Center: Government Requests for Data

-Our approach to Responsible AI
-
 Responsible AI Principles

+Redefining Work in the Age of AI
+
+Welcoming the Digital Services Act
+
 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 10 months ago

75da6a8e004ca89de0a73a03b48f5bbf1cead0f4: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2023-10-28

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 9ff7875..56db26a 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Members

 Ads transparency and controls

-Government requests
+Government requests and disclosures

 Professional Community Policies

@@ -165,6 +165,16 @@ How to contact LinkedIn under the DSA

 How to contact LinkedIn's single point of contact in connection with the Digital Services Act.

+Go to Help Center →
+
+DSA Transparency Report
+
+
+
+
+Information regarding LinkedIn’s content moderation in the EU under the Digital Services Act.
+
 Go to Help Center →

+
 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 7 months ago

650509896cb474475032c889893c493b3e482c85: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency @ 2024-02-10

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
index 56db26a..f4e0da6 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency.md
@@ -8,13 +8,6 @@ We work to keep LinkedIn safe, trusted, and professional. We provide our members
 Community Report

-How we enforce our User Agreement and Professional Community Policies for our members globally.
-
-Go to report
-
-Community Report
-
-

 How we enforce our User Agreement and Professional Community Policies for our members globally.
@@ -65,6 +58,17 @@ Layers of protection help us detect and remove inappropriate content.

 Read blog post →

+Member Data Portability
+
+
+
+
+Learn about how members can access their LinkedIn data.
+
+
+
+Go to Help Center →
+
 Misinformation and inauthentic behavior

@@ -80,7 +84,6 @@ Keeping your feed relevant and productive
 Investments we’ve made in the feed content experience.

-
 Read blog post  →

 How we address fake profiles
milonmaze commented 2 months ago

82e3a87fc5372e1c21b66208df4d8a28c724642a: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2024-07-06

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index 93c2001c..7a7bdc0c 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ We respect the laws that apply to us in the countries where we operate. In the U

 We never provide information to a government to fulfill a member data request without first trying to notify the individual member, except when applicable law prohibits us from doing so. We may make exceptions in certain emergencies.

-This report covers the six-month period between January 1 and June 30, 2023.
+This report covers the six-month period between July 1 and December 31, 2023.

 This report covers:
@@ -35,6 +35,50 @@ Global content removal requests
 2016
 2015
 2014
+   Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
+   Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
+Argentina  3   3   33% 1
+Australia  6   7   0%  0
+Austria    1   1   0%  0
+Bangladesh
+   1   1   0%  0
+Belgium    5   7   100%    7
+Brazil 32  301 53% 17
+Canada
+   10  11  70% 7
+Chile  2   3   0%  0
+Croatia    2   2   100%    2
+Czech Republic 1   1   100%    1
+Finland    2   4   50% 1
+France
+   289 298 40% 117
+Germany
+   81  122 75% 81
+Greece 4   6   25% 1
+Hungary    2   3   100%    2
+India
+   84  132 26% 24
+Italy
+   7   12  43% 3
+Kyrgyzstan
+   1   11  0%  0
+Mexico 2   2   50% 1
+Netherlands
+   10  28  80% 22
+Pakistan   1   1   0%  0
+Poland 9   11  67% 6
+Portugal   3   4   67% 3
+Qatar  1   1   0%  0
+Romania    1   2   0%  0
+Singapore  3   3   0%  0
+Spain  16  21  56% 10
+Sweden 1   1   0%  0
+Switzerland    6   6   33% 2
+Taiwan 5   12  0%  0
+Turkey 1   1   0%  0
+United Kingdom 26  31  77% 20
+United States  416 2000    81% 1114
+Total  1034    3049    60% 1442
    Requests for member data    Accounts subject to request(s) [1]  Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
    Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
 Argentina  2   2   0%  0
@@ -97,6 +141,17 @@ Breakdown of U.S. government requests for data
 2016
 2015
 2014
+Requests [1]   416
+Accounts subject to requests   2,000
+Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 81%
+Subpoenas [2]  75%
+Search warrants [3]    7%
+Court orders [4]   15%
+Other [5]  2%
+National security letters received [6] 0-499
+National security letters (accounts subject to request)
+   0-499
+FISA requests [6]  0-499
 Requests [1]   386
 Accounts subject to requests   2,053
 Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 83%
@@ -139,6 +194,21 @@ Government requests for content removal
 2019
 2018
    Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
+Australia  8   3   38%
+Brazil 19  13  68%
+Germany    1   0   0%
+Hong Kong  2   2   100%
+India  6   4   67%
+Indonesia  4   4   100%
+Ireland    1   1   100%
+Pakistan   1   0   0%
+Qatar  1   0   0%
+Singapore  2   0   0%
+Turkey 9   8   89%
+United States  97  94  97%
+Total including the US 151 129 85%
+Total minus the US 54  35  65%
+   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
 Australia  2   1   50%
 Bahrain    1   0   0%
 Bangladesh 1   1   100%
@@ -164,16 +234,16 @@ Professional Community Policies

 Law Enforcement Guidelines

-Updates to our Professional Community Policies
-
 How our content abuse systems work to keep members safe

 Help Center: Government Requests for Data

 Responsible AI Principles

-Redefining Work in the Age of AI
+Building member trust in the new age of AI

 Welcoming the Digital Services Act

+Changes for the Digital Markets Act
+
 dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 2 months ago

bb22458ecf192d8ee6128f256f958318a06a8272: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2024-07-13

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index 7a7bdc0..46b2516 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -162,88 +162,4 @@ Other [5]  1%
 National security letters received [6] 0-499
 National security letters (accounts subject to request)
    0-499
-FISA requests [6]  0-499
-
-[1] U.S. Government Requests for Member Data include all requests received by LinkedIn from the U.S. government except for national security-related requests, such as National Security Letters and requests under the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), if any.
-
-
-
-[2] Subpoenas may be issued for information that is reasonably relevant to the general subject matter of a pending investigation. They are typically pre-signed by a court clerk and are issued by prosecutors without the involvement of a judge.
-
-
-
-[3] Search warrants require the government to demonstrate "probable cause" and are generally issued by a judge. The standard applicable to a search warrant is higher than that applicable to a subpoena.
-
-
-[4] Court orders vary depending on the circumstances and the issuing court and jurisdiction. Many of the court orders LinkedIn receives are issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d), a provision of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). To obtain such an order, the government must demonstrate specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the information sought is relevant and material to an ongoing investigation. This standard is higher than that applicable to subpoenas but lower than that applicable to search warrants.
-
-
-
-
-[5] The "Other" category includes requests that do not fall within any of the above categories. Examples include emergency requests. As indicated in footnote 1, the category does not include national security-related requests.
-
-
-
-[6] In our Government Requests Reports prior to July 2019, we reported on National Security Requests, which could include National Security Letters and FISA requests. In the effort to provide more transparency to our members, we now report NLSs and FISA requests separately. Because we are required by law to delay the release of FISA data by 6 months, reported FISA request metrics correspond to the previous reporting period (for example, data for the July-December 2019 period is reported in our January-June 2020 report).
-
-Government requests for content removal
-2023
-2022
-2021
-2020
-2019
-2018
-   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
-Australia  8   3   38%
-Brazil 19  13  68%
-Germany    1   0   0%
-Hong Kong  2   2   100%
-India  6   4   67%
-Indonesia  4   4   100%
-Ireland    1   1   100%
-Pakistan   1   0   0%
-Qatar  1   0   0%
-Singapore  2   0   0%
-Turkey 9   8   89%
-United States  97  94  97%
-Total including the US 151 129 85%
-Total minus the US 54  35  65%
-   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
-Australia  2   1   50%
-Bahrain    1   0   0%
-Bangladesh 1   1   100%
-Bolivia    1   1   100%
-Brazil 4   4   100%
-China  5   4   80%
-Ghana  1   1   100%
-India  13  12  92%
-Indonesia  8   8   100%
-Qatar  1   0   0%
-Singapore  1   1   100%
-Turkey 5   5   100%
-United Kingdom 1   1   100%
-United States  5   5   100%
-Totals 49  44  90%
-
-• We started reporting on content-related requests in our January 1-June 30, 2018 Transparency Report.
-
-
-• Government Requests for Content Removal are requests received by LinkedIn from governments seeking the removal of content, including reporting violations of our Terms of Service or violations of local law.
-
-Professional Community Policies
-
-Law Enforcement Guidelines
-
-How our content abuse systems work to keep members safe
-
-Help Center: Government Requests for Data
-
-Responsible AI Principles
-
-Building member trust in the new age of AI
-
-Welcoming the Digital Services Act
-
-Changes for the Digital Markets Act
-
-dismiss
\ No newline at end of file
+FISA requests [6]  0-499
\ No newline at end of file
milonmaze commented 1 month ago

57d9363e4fabd23793fd59a8d6a2eef715fea99b: https://about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report @ 2024-07-20

difference captured: 

diff --git a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
index 46b2516..7a7bdc0 100644
--- a/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
+++ b/about.linkedin.com/transparency/government-requests-report.md
@@ -162,4 +162,88 @@ Other [5]  1%
 National security letters received [6] 0-499
 National security letters (accounts subject to request)
    0-499
-FISA requests [6]  0-499
\ No newline at end of file
+FISA requests [6]  0-499
+
+[1] U.S. Government Requests for Member Data include all requests received by LinkedIn from the U.S. government except for national security-related requests, such as National Security Letters and requests under the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), if any.
+
+
+
+[2] Subpoenas may be issued for information that is reasonably relevant to the general subject matter of a pending investigation. They are typically pre-signed by a court clerk and are issued by prosecutors without the involvement of a judge.
+
+
+
+[3] Search warrants require the government to demonstrate "probable cause" and are generally issued by a judge. The standard applicable to a search warrant is higher than that applicable to a subpoena.
+
+
+[4] Court orders vary depending on the circumstances and the issuing court and jurisdiction. Many of the court orders LinkedIn receives are issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d), a provision of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). To obtain such an order, the government must demonstrate specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the information sought is relevant and material to an ongoing investigation. This standard is higher than that applicable to subpoenas but lower than that applicable to search warrants.
+
+
+
+
+[5] The "Other" category includes requests that do not fall within any of the above categories. Examples include emergency requests. As indicated in footnote 1, the category does not include national security-related requests.
+
+
+
+[6] In our Government Requests Reports prior to July 2019, we reported on National Security Requests, which could include National Security Letters and FISA requests. In the effort to provide more transparency to our members, we now report NLSs and FISA requests separately. Because we are required by law to delay the release of FISA data by 6 months, reported FISA request metrics correspond to the previous reporting period (for example, data for the July-December 2019 period is reported in our January-June 2020 report).
+
+Government requests for content removal
+2023
+2022
+2021
+2020
+2019
+2018
+   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
+Australia  8   3   38%
+Brazil 19  13  68%
+Germany    1   0   0%
+Hong Kong  2   2   100%
+India  6   4   67%
+Indonesia  4   4   100%
+Ireland    1   1   100%
+Pakistan   1   0   0%
+Qatar  1   0   0%
+Singapore  2   0   0%
+Turkey 9   8   89%
+United States  97  94  97%
+Total including the US 151 129 85%
+Total minus the US 54  35  65%
+   Requests    Action taken    Percentage action taken
+Australia  2   1   50%
+Bahrain    1   0   0%
+Bangladesh 1   1   100%
+Bolivia    1   1   100%
+Brazil 4   4   100%
+China  5   4   80%
+Ghana  1   1   100%
+India  13  12  92%
+Indonesia  8   8   100%
+Qatar  1   0   0%
+Singapore  1   1   100%
+Turkey 5   5   100%
+United Kingdom 1   1   100%
+United States  5   5   100%
+Totals 49  44  90%
+
+• We started reporting on content-related requests in our January 1-June 30, 2018 Transparency Report.
+
+
+• Government Requests for Content Removal are requests received by LinkedIn from governments seeking the removal of content, including reporting violations of our Terms of Service or violations of local law.
+
+Professional Community Policies
+
+Law Enforcement Guidelines
+
+How our content abuse systems work to keep members safe
+
+Help Center: Government Requests for Data
+
+Responsible AI Principles
+
+Building member trust in the new age of AI
+
+Welcoming the Digital Services Act
+
+Changes for the Digital Markets Act
+
+dismiss
\ No newline at end of file