Closed lehnberg closed 4 years ago
Do you think it makes sense to add an item for an initial slatepack discussion considering the timeline?
Sure, agenda updated. :+1:
I think there is way too much open pull requests and issues that have been hanging for far too long on the grin repo. For the PRs: Most of the PR are fine but needs review. I propose that we "distribute" the pull requests to reviewers like we did a few months ago, For the issues: I did a pass yesterday but I believe a lot of them could be closed like:
Title | Opened On | Link |
---|---|---|
Study support of vaults in grin/mimblewimble | 02/07/17 | https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/issues/71 |
Investigate UTXO Obsolescence | 09/03/18 | https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/issues/763 |
NAT Traversal Support | 28/04/18 | https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/issues/1205 |
Bittorrent support for txhashset download | 09/04/19 | https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/issues/2740 |
I2P Support Meta-issue | 26/03/19 | https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/issues/2712 |
Fence off txhashset validation in its own process | 09/04/19 | https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/issues/2741 |
Add TLS to p2p connections | 25/08/18 | https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/issues/1420 |
This is just a few examples (taking too long to make this table...).
I don't think we should target a 0 issues and 0 prs but I do believe we should do some kind of spring cleanup.
Also release grin and grin-wallet 3.1.1 to crates.io.
Updated agenda with these points :+1:
Solicit suggestions for agenda items for the Development meeting to be held on Tuesday May 12 @ 15:00 UTC in grincoin#dev channel on Keybase. Please comment to provide topics or suggestions.
Proposed agenda