mimiframework / Mimi.jl

Integrated Assessment Modeling Framework
https://www.mimiframework.org
Other
66 stars 34 forks source link

Fix a performance problem with adding RVs #986

Closed davidanthoff closed 6 months ago

codecov[bot] commented 6 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.81%. Comparing base (1bdbc78) to head (333ac69).

Files Patch % Lines
src/mcs/montecarlo.jl 50.00% 2 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #986 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 84.77% 84.81% +0.03% ========================================== Files 40 40 Lines 4058 4062 +4 ========================================== + Hits 3440 3445 +5 + Misses 618 617 -1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/mimiframework/Mimi.jl/pull/986/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mimiframework) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/mimiframework/Mimi.jl/pull/986/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mimiframework) | `84.81% <83.33%> (+0.03%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mimiframework#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.