Closed fg-mindee closed 4 months ago
@frgfm only @SiddhantBahuguna PR left or do you have other augmentations in mind ? :)
For now, I think the random perspective would be the last one required yeah :+1:
Hi @SiddhantBahuguna any way in near future that you finish your draft PR ? :) Or should we keep it free to take ?
Hi @SiddhantBahuguna any way in near future that you finish your draft PR ? :) Or should we keep it free to take ?
Greetings @felixdittrich92 , I am really sorry for the unwanted delay. I will get it done this week positively :) Sorry again !
Sounds nice :hugs: :+1:
@SiddhantBahuguna Do you think you could finish your PR that we can close this ? :)
@odulcy-mindee I think we can close this ? I don't see any issues with different perspectives (detection models) your dataset seems to capture this already well. Or do you think we should add RandomPerspective as last one ftm ?
Yeah, this issue can be closed, that's fine
As discussed in #654, the artefact detection needs to improve its robustness. In order to do so and prevent overfitting, I would suggest gradually extending the list of our supported transformations:
Ideally, a given transform should be implemented in
doctr/transforms/modules
so that with the corresponding backend, we can do:for transformations that only change the image.
and:
for transformations that alter the target. In doing so, that will work nicely with our Dataloaders :+1: