Closed int-ua closed 4 years ago
I'm going to publish new commits here but do not merge this PR, I'll squish commits before merging and will create a new one before final merge.
Is there anything else I can improve before merging?
@int-ua If you're happy with the functionality, I can give it a try again to check whether it works as expected. Code style review will happen in the same step.
Will wait the PR is no longer [WIP]
.
EDIT: Regarding the commit from me - I took the opportunity to try to make it shorter and a bit more precise. Feel free to change the documentation if you'd prefer another text.
Yes, please do it. I'm keeping [WIP] to avoid merging before squashing commits manually to save SwissalpS' and your contribution in Co-authored-by
, ok?
Is it possible to add a partial ItemStack to the alloy furnace's input list? The PR works so far, but the following scenario should be improved if possible:
The 99 tin ingots are rejected, even though they could fill up the slot. EDIT: Feel free to squash the PR. The changes are easy to review in a single commit.
* Alloy furnace: [20x tin ingot] [Empty] * Tube: 99x tin ingot
The 99 tin ingots are rejected, even though they could fill up the slot.
What is the state of "Allow splitting" setting? AFAIU you had it on off and it's working as intended, not splitting incoming stack, no?
EDIT: they should be split with current code with the setting being on.
@int-ua Sorry, I totally forgot about that setting. It indeed works as expected now. There's only a single comment left over, everything else is ready to merge.
1a45ad19
New version made with SwissalpS, supersedes #521 Fixes #520