Adding Makefile and creating script to partition and mount data partition

[hferentschik]

Addresses issue #13 and issue #18

[hferentschik]

@praveenkumar I've added a new commit c22cf42 which adds a new systemd unit file. This seems to make it work for me. No idea why this does not seem to be required for you. See also https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/25098. WDYT?

[hferentschik]

BTW, what docker version do you end up with? I end up with 1.10.3, which seems rather old. Maybe something else goes wrong earlier on and I end up with an old Docker version which forces me to add this additional systemd file?

[praveenkumar]

what docker version do you end up with?

Because that's what in the CentOS tree.

$ docker-machine ls
NAME          ACTIVE   DRIVER   STATE     URL                         SWARM   DOCKER    ERRORS
centos        -        kvm      Running   tcp://192.168.42.46:2376            v1.10.3   

[praveenkumar]

No idea why this does not seem to be required for you. See also docker/docker#25098. WDYT?

@hferentschik I did test with virtualbox driver and looks like that also working as expected without any addition of that file.

➜ github docker-machine ls
NAME          ACTIVE   DRIVER       STATE     URL                         SWARM   DOCKER    ERRORS
centos-live   -        virtualbox   Running   tcp://192.168.99.100:2376           v1.10.3    

[hferentschik]

I did test with virtualbox driver and looks like that also working as expected without any addition of that file.

Ok, so the Docker version seems to be the same. I am a bit at loss why I see this problem and I need to create this docker.socker systemd unit file. GIven the old version of Docker, it seems to make sense. AFAIU this file was indeed used/required in older Docker versions. Something is not quite right here yet.

What about we merge the pull request without the c22cf42 commit? I think the actual formatting and mounting aspect of issue #13 is addressed. c22cf42 belongs probably more to issue #20 anyways. We need to find out why we see different behavior here. Let's continue discussing on issue #20

[praveenkumar]

What about we merge the pull request without the c22cf42 commit?

yes that make sense, and discuss about certificate generation on issue #20

[hferentschik]

yes that make sense, and discuss about certificate generation on issue #20

+1

[praveenkumar]

Merged except https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos-live-iso/commit/c22cf42cb3b1cc87351077fdd3c778d229a2551d and discussion is on issue #20

[hferentschik]

Thanks.