Open nixpanic opened 5 years ago
@nixpanic do you see any value addition if we add glusterfs-fuse
package for minishift iso side? I mean this is going to be a single node cluster and we use the PV
which is created by oc cluster up
. If you can provide a use case for this, we can add it. If you want to use current iso then take it from http://artifacts.ci.centos.org/minishift/minishift-centos-iso/pr/11/ .
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:30:23PM +0000, Praveen Kumar wrote:
@nixpanic do you see any value addition if we add
glusterfs-fuse
package for minishift iso side? I mean this is going to be a single node cluster and we use thePV
which is created byoc cluster up
. If you can provide a use case for this, we can add it. If you want to use current iso then take it from http://artifacts.ci.centos.org/minishift/minishift-centos-iso/pr/11/ .
Yes, we have users testing with minikube/minishift if dynamic provisioning with Gluster is suitable for them. It is possible to deploy Gluster on a single-node, it is just not useful for high-availability.
A related change in minikube was merged a while back: https://github.com/kubernetes/minikube/pull/2925
I'm working on an add-on for minikube at the moment. Once the container images support a simpler way of getting deployed, I'll send it as a PR. After that, I plan to do the same thing for minishift.
The centos image does indeed not have the glusterfs-fuse package either. It would be good to add it there as well. That needs a 2-step installation process though:
Gluster is one of the commonly used backends for dynamically provisioned PVCs. In order for pods to use the PVCs, these need to get mounted on the host. The glusterfs-fuse package is needed to provide the
mount.glusterfs
helper and dependencies.Please install the glusterfs-fuse package in the
fedora.template
.