timh1704 said:
Could you please check the performance history of this player [playerid=309896494]. The stats show a jump in loyality from 15 to 20 (week 3 compared to week 4). His actual loyality is supposed to be 15. Similar behaviour could also be observed for other players [playerid=323819502] [playerid=322034027] here it even changed back to 15 again a week later [playerid=322328140] [playerid=309001014]
CatzHoek said:
I can observe this for all my players that haven't been in the lineup/bench in the friendly yesterday [b]and[/b] saturday series match.
I have 2 players [playerid=235155505] and [playerid=272714296] that played one of the games and sat on the bench (but didn't play) in the other. For them everythink looks fine.
HT-Gusy said:
We've fixed the code about a week ago so loyalty values are added correctly. But unfortunately the wrong data is very hard to fix so I guess it will stay that way (it's for non-played matches anyway so not that big of a deal).
This might be annoying and possibly generate a lot of unecessary forum spam. Mayb we could add a * or turn it into a question mark or something.
minj
commented
9 years ago
Original issue 860 created by CatzHoek on 2011-12-01T19:43:01.000Z:
timh1704 said: Could you please check the performance history of this player [playerid=309896494]. The stats show a jump in loyality from 15 to 20 (week 3 compared to week 4). His actual loyality is supposed to be 15. Similar behaviour could also be observed for other players [playerid=323819502] [playerid=322034027] here it even changed back to 15 again a week later [playerid=322328140] [playerid=309001014]
CatzHoek said: I can observe this for all my players that haven't been in the lineup/bench in the friendly yesterday [b]and[/b] saturday series match. I have 2 players [playerid=235155505] and [playerid=272714296] that played one of the games and sat on the bench (but didn't play) in the other. For them everythink looks fine.
HT-Gusy said: We've fixed the code about a week ago so loyalty values are added correctly. But unfortunately the wrong data is very hard to fix so I guess it will stay that way (it's for non-played matches anyway so not that big of a deal).
This might be annoying and possibly generate a lot of unecessary forum spam. Mayb we could add a * or turn it into a question mark or something.