search

minreiseah / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Further elaboration for the `edit` command #17

Open minreiseah opened 2 months ago

minreiseah commented 2 months ago

image.png

It should be elaborated within this point what exactly the "EMPLOYEE_ID" is. While it is stated in the introduction, it might not be clear for a user who clicks the hyperlink straight to this command.

soc-pe-bot commented 2 months ago

Team's Response

This is a claim that is not just exclusive for EMPLOYEE_ID. This has already been addressed at the top of the features section on command formats.

If the user clicks straight to the edit function, the user would also not understand that the [] is meant to indicate optional parameters or the NAME is meant to indicate that the user should type a name as an input. As such we would expect that the reader would eventually go up and read that section even if they first skipped it. It would be very unnecessary for us to copy the entire command format section and paste it under every single command.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]