Open minzzelo opened 4 years ago
While it does mention that we support that feature in the UG, we also urged users to note that. "Every command will have its own specific format so do pay close attention to the command’s requirements!"
Furthermore, the editTag command works with only 2 prefixes, unlike the larger commands, this means that the mental overhead that goes into typing in this command is very small and so we dont expect users to make this mistake. This command works on the principle that the user is very clear what old tag they want to modify to the target new tag. Hence this feature is not included and unnecessary for this feature. This is the way the application and this command is supposed to work and is not a bug.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: Since it was mentioned in the UG that the multiple same prefixes behaviour is supported, I believe that the team should have at least declared explicitly an exception for editTag, if it was not supported for the command. Since there is a contradiction between the UG and actual behaviour of the app, I believe that it is an inaccuracy between expected and actual behavior, which translates to a bug.
Team chose [severity.Low
]
Originally [severity.Medium
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
I believe that this should be allowed since it was declared in UG that only tbe last prefix will be considered when there are multiple same prefixes