Previously a list of name and fingerprint was passed, which was not used at all.
In practice, a single fingerprint is sufficient. With this change, providing the
fingerprint of a certificate that is valid for certain IP addresses will work
nicely (similar to what #152 does for chain of trust).
Previously a list of name and fingerprint was passed, which was not used at all. In practice, a single fingerprint is sufficient. With this change, providing the fingerprint of a certificate that is valid for certain IP addresses will work nicely (similar to what #152 does for chain of trust).
//cc @reynir